On page 40 of these documents, it states that there is ‘nothing in the file to document the status of the applicants’s son’..”please inquire into his citizenship and residence status.....”
There is an official request for ‘documentation’..yet none is accompanying this document dump, other than the ‘letter’. No corroborating evidence like a birth certificate, etc. Sorry..but that letter doesn’t prove a thing. In fact it deepens the whole mystery imho.
BTW..the copies used on this site are crap to try and read. Who set up the site you linked to jamese?
I expect that future triers of fact will react the same way that 71 courts have reacted thus far in dismissing Obama eligibility lawsuits; just like the federal judge quoted below did:
“The Court observes that the President defeated seven opponents in a grueling campaign for his party’s nomination that lasted more than eighteen months and cost those opponents well over $300 million. Then the President faced a formidable opponent in the general election who received $84 million to conduct his general election campaign against the President. It would appear that ample opportunity existed for discovery of evidence that would support any contention that the President was not eligible for the office he sought. Furthermore, Congress is apparently satisfied that the President is qualified to serve. Congress has not instituted impeachment proceedings, and in fact, the House of Representatives in a broad bipartisan manner has rejected the suggestion that the President is not eligible for office. See H.R. Res. 593, 111th Cong. (2009) (commemorating, by vote of 378-0, the 50th anniversary of Hawaii’s statehood and stating, ‘the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961’).”
“A spurious claim questioning the President’s constitutional legitimacy may be protected by the First Amendment, but a Court’s placement of its imprimatur upon a claim that is so lacking in factual support that it is frivolous would undoubtedly disserve the public interest.“–US Federal District Court Judge for the Middle District of Georgia Clay D. Land in dismissing “Rhodes v MacDonald” September 16, 2009
It is obvious to me that every single ‘point’ you make is stolen right off of the OBOT websites.A quick google proves it. You are spinning the same set of obot talking points over and over again.
Bottom line...Obama is hiding something and it’s obviously something big. It is also obvious that his BC is most likely one of the things that have been redacted from this FOIA document dump concerning his mother’s passports. The authorities were asking for proof of her son’s citizenship and status. I have my doubts about this letter you and the Obots have zeroed in on. It seems out of place and has no supporting evidence of fact.
Remember...the truth always rises to the surface. Make sure you are prepared to open your eyes to the truth when the time comes.