To: kristinn
The caucus has long complained that the House ethics process disproportionally targets African Americans in the chamber.
All they ever do -ever- is complain that they are being “targeted disproportionally”. Police in the neighborhood, hiring, bank loans, now House members...all targeted disproportionally.
5 posted on
08/01/2010 12:49:59 PM PDT by
Personal Responsibility
(The problem isn't that 1% of muslims are terrorists. The problem is 99% of terrorists are muslim)
To: Personal Responsibility
All they ever do -ever- is complain that they are being “targeted disproportionally”. Police in the neighborhood, hiring, bank loans, now House members...all targeted disproportionally.
If they are being "targeted disproportionally", history shows that it is necessary.
9 posted on
08/01/2010 1:07:36 PM PDT by
Dewey Revoltnow
(Worst. Community. Organizer. Ever!)
To: Personal Responsibility
Then they should not be committing a disproportionate amount of crime then!
14 posted on
08/01/2010 1:24:48 PM PDT by
Niuhuru
(The Internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)
To: Personal Responsibility
Whether or not they are guilty doesn’t matter. We are all racists.
To: Personal Responsibility
All they ever do -ever- is complain that they are being “targeted disproportionally”. Police in the neighborhood, hiring, bank loans, now House members...all targeted disproportionally. Sometimes I wonder, when I read about a kid getting expelled for drawing a (picture of a) gun, (it's always a white kid), or when a Canadian mother gets her son put in Oregon foster care because he was riding his bike without a helmet, I wonder if these aren't just drummed up to keep the number of white suspensions/arrests/foster care cases proportional to the other races.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson