To: null and void
60K of unemployment does not cut it for me regardless of which sex is getting the most unemployment. Like the poster said, it was not needed anyway. Yes, when the nation’s money is running out, unemployment should be need based.
59 posted on
08/01/2010 10:31:18 AM PDT by
ex-snook
("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory")
To: ex-snook
So, you support income redistribution?
60 posted on
08/01/2010 10:35:15 AM PDT by
JoSixChip
(You think your having a bad day?.....Just remember, somewhere out there is a Mr. Pelosi!)
To: ex-snook
Yeah. A family that had earned upwards of $200K/year by productively contributing to society and paying unemployment insurance for decades does not deserve to collect unemployment for both jobs lost.
Screw them and their $400,000 mortgage, they should be living on the streets like the deadbeats they are!
Or maybe they could simply get a divorce and both collect. There are too many married people anyway. Wouldn't that be better?
63 posted on
08/01/2010 10:40:05 AM PDT by
null and void
(We are now in day 554 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson