Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zakeet
The Pentagon, which is investigating the source of the leak, is expected to study Mr Manning’s background to ascertain if they missed any warnings when he applied to join the US Army. The postings on his Facebook page are also likely to form part of the inquiry.

Mr Manning, who is openly homosexual, began his gloomy postings on January 12, saying: "Bradley Manning didn't want this fight. Too much to lose, too fast."

"to ascertain if they missed any warnings when he applied to join the US Army?"

Whiskey, Tango, Foxtrot?

Ah, methinks it's a little late eh morons?

As someone who worked both covert (in Nam) and overt Intelligence in the USAF (and recruited Agents Agents and Confidential Informants) as well as having done a 3 year stint in the USAF OSI and was responsible for conducting background Security Clearance Investigations, something here stinks to high heaven.

While the military (and gov't) have (or used to anyway) a tendency to over classify some information, ANYTHING to do with Agents/Sources should at the very least, be classified TOP SECRET.

Secondly, how did this lowly PFC get authorization or access to such information?

Last but not least, someone in the Army CID did a p*ss poor job vetting this a-hole not only before his enlistment but certainly during his background investigation.

There HAD TO BE many telltale signs of his philosophy/ideology as those don't usually simply manifest themselves and lead one to commit treason over a lover's spat and btw, if he was openly gay, did that not set off warning bells as far as his being a security risk as well?

And, am I missing something here as I thought the "Don't ask--don't tell" policy was in affect and openly practicing homosexuals were being discharged?

I guess we will learn more in time, but something just does not compute!!!

22 posted on 07/31/2010 3:00:59 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet ((One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Conservative Vermont Vet
Secondly, how did this lowly PFC get authorization or access to such information?

Where is the Congressional investigation?

(They're all on the HRC take)

25 posted on 07/31/2010 3:37:09 AM PDT by cmj328 (Got ruthless?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

We sure won’t learn much from our media.


41 posted on 07/31/2010 6:57:09 AM PDT by mimaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet
Secondly, how did this lowly PFC get authorization or access to such information?

How did an openly homosexual get a TS ?

Who provided him with the need to know ??


77 posted on 08/01/2010 2:20:58 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

I am late to this thread, but apparently he had previously been demoted for fighting with another soldier.


81 posted on 08/03/2010 1:09:09 PM PDT by panthermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson