US Stock Futures Fall After 2.4% Rise In 2Q GDP; DJIA Off 70 (less than EXPECTED 2Q growth)

We agree. Perhaps I wasn't clear in what I wrote. I know the effect of deficit spending long term, what I meant was, taxes and spending are not directly connected. You could lower tax rates and actually collect more money in total. And you could also raise taxes and have lower tax receipts.

The talking heads would have you believe that we will raise taxes and lower debt. That is bogus. Always has been. If you remember Bush 41's pledge of "NO NEW TAXES", what happened was, he made a deal with the Dems( NEVER a good idea) that he would raise taxes if they would lower spending. Of course he kept his word and the Dems moved their lips so they were lying. He took the biggest political hit in history for believing a Dem. So, after sacrificing his 2nd term, we still end up with higher taxes and higher spending and more debt. Gingrich did it right. He balanced the budget by raising spending less than inflation,........period. That's it, easy. Remember the gubmint shut down? He meant business and fixed the country in one term. Course, the bent one got the credit after saying just one year earlier in the SOTUnion "Deficit's as far as the eye can see". Clinton's tax policy had nothing to do with anything. It was Gingrich and the Republicans SLOWING( not cutting) spending.

The secret of inflation is borrowing money when a dollar is worth something and paying the debt off with worthless paper. Obama doesn't care because he knows that it will all work out in the wash when a dollar is worth a dime he just pays China with worthless money. Sorta like buying a TV from China for $1000 and paying off the debt with $800. Its a trick as old as Argentina. Course Americans will have to get used to living in tar paper shacks and riding mopeds, but hey, thats what the Dems have been shooting for forever. Us evil Americans must be brought down to the Vietnamese or Kenyan level to be "fair".

"You could lower tax rates and actually collect more money in total. And you could also raise taxes and have lower tax receipts."

Yes, yes - absolutely. In fact, I believe that after we recovered from the 200/2001 recession, federal tax receipts as a percentage of GDP were at an all time high, even after the Bush tax cuts. I'd have to look a little more closely at the figures myself, but I have previously read that.

Essentially, it completely undercuts the opinion that the Bush tax cuts were responsible for the deficit - they weren't. We had more revenue as a percent-to-GDP than we ever had, but we also had ridiculously unrestrained spending. Expense was our problem, not revenue.

If you want to get right down to the “brass tacks” of what the people really want it would be to have a minimalist government with maximum freedom. In order to have that we must cut the budget for things like farm subsidies that lose votes in the Midwest, oil subsidies which lose votes in the south, and beekeeper, solar, wind, and on and on that always seem to lose some votes somewhere. I just don't know if we will ever have the “cojones” to do what is needed to get our country back. People seem to have a false notion that big spending helps things and it requires higher taxes. Even Reublicans are falling into the trap of "If you start a program, you have to pay for it". No You don't. We have had deficit spending for 200 years. What we should be saying is keep the taxes low and quit thinking up crap to spend money on. Low taxes garauntee's more freedom and prosperity, while government spending just raises the debt. Just think about the economy if the "right" Repblicans could win and we cut spending from $2+ trillion to say $1 trillion. The economy would blast off without changing a thing on the tax side. It's like telling a sick person they need more leeches and they agree till they die. I, frankly can remember in my lifetime not ever giving a hoot what the government thought or did, other than wars. Now, tax planning and reading regulation changes is an everyday thing to plan your life around. In the past we didn't have health care problems until Medicare and Medicaid came along and most people seem to have other funds to augment their retirement. Now it seems we try to live on Social Security alone and depend on the government for our health care when we get old. The more people we have feeding at the trough, the more Democrats we will have to defeat at each election. Schools were better when we didn't have a Dept. of Education, and you could make a list of other wastes of money that have been formed over the last 40 years, OSHA, EPA, ect. We just simply can't afford it any longer and it takes the fun out of being American. When it gets easier to live in Panama than in the US, maybe would reassess what we are doing to ourselves.

Telling people that taxes and spending are not connected at the hip is important for voters to finally comprehend. I'm also passionate about correcting people when they say we are a democracy. We are a Republic and there are important reasons for that. As you can see recently, Dems want to circumvent the Constitution and give their state electors to the popular vote winner instead of the local vote winner. This is what the founders thoughtfully solved when they invented the Electoral College. Now, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Kansas and others will be told to go to hell by New York and California. All this because people have been allowed to believe we are a democracy.

Everyone knows the jobs report is fiction, but what Wall Street is looking for is a big number “created”. The rate will be up or down depending on how many stopped looking, so if the rate goes to 9.4% or some such number, the Dems will be crowing, but Wall Street will be selling. We need a big number like up 250k to get Wall Streets attention. We have to make 150k-200k a month just to keep up with newbies joining the workforce. If we get 20k or something, Obama will crow that he is growing the job base because it's not negative. Everybody that knows anything knows that's not true. The 4% rate under Bush looks pretty good about now I would think. He would get a 300k new number and the talking heads would say that's anemic. Sept and Oct is coming so we have to have a reason to go down on Wall Street. November could be big with a Repub takeover. 2011 will depend entirely on Bush tax cuts being extended. If they are modified or expire, 2011 will be a baaaaaaad year. Right now, I'm betting bad year. The damage is done and in the pipe. Sometimes you just have to pay for your vote. The Bible teaches us that the Jews paid for bad kings and were blessed with a good king. We made our choice, now we pay.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.