Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shirley Sherrod says she will sue Andrew Breitbart
Hotair ^ | 07/29/2010 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 07/29/2010 12:33:22 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: SeekAndFind

“The edited video posted by Andrew Breitbart led Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack to ask Sherrod to resign, a decision he reconsidered after seeing the entire video of her March speech to a local NAACP group.”

So, basically, this is a matter for the courts because Tom Vilsack (he had nothing to do with it, obviously, but going along with the story) was too lazy to click on a link.


21 posted on 07/29/2010 12:42:40 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

People who publicly give speeches about “hatin whitey” suing. Unreal.


22 posted on 07/29/2010 12:42:55 PM PDT by Frantzie (Democrats = Party of I*lam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
ROTFLOL Shirley, you're not only a racist you're stupid.

"You know, I haven't seen such a mean-spirited people as I've seen lately over this issue of health care. Some of the racism we thought was buried. Didn't it surface? Now, we endured eight years of the Bush's and we didn't do the stuff these Republicans are doing because you have a black President."

Shirley Sherrod 3/27/2010 @ Georgia NAACP meeting

----------------------------------------------

While appearing on Anderson Cooper’s 360, Sherrod stated that Breitbart would “like to get us stuck back in the time of slavery.”


23 posted on 07/29/2010 12:43:35 PM PDT by TigersEye (Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

And Breitbart, for effect, should use a team of all-black lawyers and try to get a black judge for a bench trial.


24 posted on 07/29/2010 12:43:56 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

I think she comes out the big loser. She has no damages that I can see. What she risks is a broad airing of her victory in her case against USDA, where she and her group settled for 13 million in taxpayer dollars. She and her husband got an additional 300K for their alleged suffering.

I dont think it will play well, nor will an airing of other dumb things she has said. She equates Republican with racist, the more she talks the more she sounds less like a racial healer and more like a real loon. JMHO.


25 posted on 07/29/2010 12:44:04 PM PDT by freespirited (There are a lot of bad Republicans but there are no good Democrats.--Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
So, now it's against the rules to expose a black racist? That's all Breitbart did, after all.

By rights, she should be suing Vilsack and the USDA - oh, but she's already done that before on another racebaiting charge.

What statute covers this case, the "thin skin" law? All that Breitbart did was embarass her - which she deserved based on her remarks in the tape.

The NAACP bellowed for weeks about all of the "racists" in the TPM, but none could prove it...all Breitbart did was actually PROVE there were racists in the NAACP.

Here's the advice they need to take next time..."Don't start nothin', and there won't be nothin'".
26 posted on 07/29/2010 12:44:04 PM PDT by FrankR (It doesn't matter what they call us, only what we answer to....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Once again I think they’re simply trying to pull us off the black pamper case.


27 posted on 07/29/2010 12:44:33 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Wicket
Everything we have come to know and learn about Shirley Sherrod, the process and approach she means to take, all is quite logical, procto-logical that is.
28 posted on 07/29/2010 12:45:09 PM PDT by lbryce (Obama Notwithstanding, America's Best Days Are Yet To Be .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

This is like the NAACP not bothering to look up “niggardly” in a dictionary.


29 posted on 07/29/2010 12:45:21 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All
Why isn't she suing the NAACP and the obama administration????
30 posted on 07/29/2010 12:46:26 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Anti-Gunners suffer from Factose Intolerance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is excellent IMO.

It keeps this Sherrod hypocrite in front of the people and exposing the NAACP, White House and all of the racist marxists for what they are.

GO BREITBART!


31 posted on 07/29/2010 12:46:51 PM PDT by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality: Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well excellent. He gets to go through ALL her stuff during discovery.


32 posted on 07/29/2010 12:47:35 PM PDT by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

33 posted on 07/29/2010 12:48:15 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Anti-Gunners suffer from Factose Intolerance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

She might have a case against Vilsack. He fired her before the story even broke, and he said he was firing her for fear of what Glenn Beck would do with the story.

If she wants to sue, there’s her target. Breitbart didn’t do anything to her, Vilsack did.

Now, Vilsack said that he fired her in part because he was trying to move forward having dealt with thousands of discrimination lawsuits. He didn’t mention directly that one of the biggest ones was Sherrod’s lawsuit that cost his department $13 million dollars. It seems strange that she would be working for a department that she also successfully sued for $13 million.

I’m not sure how much of the thirteen million was her share. She and her husband were awarded $300k, and also I believe a piece of the 13 million, but I’m not sure how many ways the money was divided out. Still, seems like a conflict of interest on her part, and also seems like Vilsack may have had other reasons for wanting her gone.


34 posted on 07/29/2010 12:48:41 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Don’t get carried away. The last time I remember the black community saying “trust us” was when the prosecutor was picking OJ’s jury.


35 posted on 07/29/2010 12:49:26 PM PDT by henkster (A broken government does not merit full faith and credit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I watched a clip of her on another site, where she is a guest on The View and I swear I thought Joy “The Pig” Behar and some other guest were going to fight over Sherrod. You could see the hate in her eyes when Elizabeth was speaking.


36 posted on 07/29/2010 12:49:33 PM PDT by timeflies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In her full transcript she actually proves Breitbart’s case, when she accuses Repubs of being racists for opposing health care.

So, while allegedly proving that she no longer sees the world through racial lenses, she actually proves the reverse. She is not capable of seeing the world any other way.


37 posted on 07/29/2010 12:51:59 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Le Chien Rouge

LOL!There has to be some stigma attached to that line of work- When someone says to you, “My Johnny just got accepted to LAW SCHOOL!!!!”, just say “Oh. Really..now” as COLDLY as you possibly can;)


38 posted on 07/29/2010 12:53:30 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Excellent — I hope he counter-sues over the false and slanderous claims/charges she’s made about him on her little public pontification tour.


39 posted on 07/29/2010 12:54:21 PM PDT by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Get whitey.


40 posted on 07/29/2010 12:54:38 PM PDT by hsrazorback1 (Seek truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson