Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777

Being dismissed on lack of standing is the Supreme court way of saying thay don’t want to get involved. They want congress to remove obama . When we have Supreme court justices that don’t want to support the Constitution ,our nation has some serious issues to deal with.


381 posted on 07/29/2010 7:55:24 PM PDT by omegadawn (qualified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]


To: omegadawn

Being dismissed on lack of standing is the Supreme court way of saying thay don’t want to get involved. They want congress to remove obama . When we have Supreme court justices that don’t want to support the Constitution ,our nation has some serious issues to deal with.


But the Supreme Court hasn’t ruled on standing in any of the Obama eligibility lawsuits. Only the state and federal courts below the Supreme Court have issued such rulings.

The Supreme Court has refused to hear any of the appeals. They only accept about 5% of the cases sent to them in any year and it take four justices to agree to hear a case (The rule of Four). When they reject a case (”denied cert”) they usually don’t state a reason for rejecting it. The appeal just shows up on the list of denied Petitions for Writs of Certiorari (please hear our appeal Mr. and Madam Justices).


387 posted on 07/29/2010 8:38:57 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson