Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: imfleck
You just forget that he swore an oath to the Constitution, which is HIS conviction. He did NOT swore an oath to the commanding officer or to the Commander- in-THIEF!!!

So now he doesn't have a right to refer to his Constitutional rights???

How ‘bout if the CinC’s credentials were already validated by the certifying authority? Would that help or hinder the PO3’s case?

Where and HOW were these validated, isn't that what the whole case is about???

173 posted on 07/29/2010 11:52:08 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: danamco

Nope, I didn’t forget his oath, the one where he swore that he would “...support and defend the constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic...”
He didn’t really swear an oath to the constitution, rather he swore that he would support and defend it.

If we’re going to use his “oath” as any part of the argument then we have to consider that he isn’t tasked with determining who the “enemies” are. He’s a doctor and as far as I can tell isn’t qualified to make that determination. As a matter of fact, it’s NOT his decision.

His birth certificate was validated by the Hawaii Department of Health in June 2008 as described here:
http://mariopiperni.com/barack-obama/the-obama-birth-certificate-non-story-and-more-republican-nonsense.php

I’m sure he’s not giving up any constitutional rights as that’s not what is being argued, but I’m pretty sure he’s going to be found guilty. As he should.


198 posted on 07/29/2010 12:26:02 PM PDT by imfleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson