Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LTC Lakin Makes Formal Request of Hawaii Deposition
safeguardourconstitution ^ | 7/29/2010 | American Patriot Foundation

Posted on 07/29/2010 1:01:40 AM PDT by rxsid

"Press Release: Lakin Makes Formal Request of Hawaii Deposition

American Patriot Foundation, Inc.
1101 Thirtieth Street, N.W., Suite 500
Washington, D.C. 20007
www.safeguardourconstitution.com

DECORATED ARMY DOCTOR LTC TERRY LAKIN MAKES FORMAL REQUEST TO COMMANDING GENERAL FOR DEPOSITION OF HAWAII STATE DEPT OF HEALTH

Testimony Sought of “Custodian of Records” AND Production of all records relating to President

Decision to be made by Army Major General

Washington, D.C., July 29, 2010. The Army doctor who is facing a court martial for refusing to obey orders, including a deployment order for his second tour of duty in Afghanistan, has formally requested his Commanding General approve a deposition in Hawaii of the records-keeper of the State Department of Health—and the production of all of their records concerning Barack Obama.

The records Lakin seeks have been the subject of intense interest ever since the closing days of the 2008 presidential campaign when a document appeared on the internet purporting to be a certification that Hawaii’s Dept. of Health had records showing he had been born in Honolulu. Since then, Dr. Chiyome Fukino the head of that agency has made public statements on the subject, but has refused all requests for copies of the actual records in the Department’s custody. Recently, a former Hawaii elections clerk has come forward saying that he was told that the Department’s records showed Obama was NOT born in Hawaii.

The United States Constitution requires that a person be a “natural born citizen” to be elected to the presidency. If Mr. Obama was not born in Honolulu as he has claimed, then he is unlikely to be a “natural born citizen”. An examination of the records kept by the Hawaii Dept. of Health are an essential first step in ascertaining Mr. Obama’s constitutional eligibility to hold the office to which he was elected in 2008.

While no civil litigant has obtained discovery of these records, and all the civil lawsuits seeking those records have been dismissed on procedural grounds, Lakin’s case is different because he is the subject of criminal prosecution, and upon conviction stands in jeopardy of being sentenced to years at hard labor in the penitentiary.

Lakin’s request was submitted by his counsel to the Commanding General of the Military District of Washington, Major General Karl R. Horst, under Rule 702(b) of the Rules for Courts-Martial, which provides that “A convening authority who has the charges for disposition or, after referral, the convening authority or the military judge may order that a deposition be taken on request of a party.”

Lakin’s civilian attorney has been provided to him by the American Patriot Foundation, a non-profit group incorporated in 2003 to foster appreciation and respect for the U.S. Constitution, which has established a fund for Lakin’s legal defense to LTC Lakin. Further details are available on the Foundation’s website, www.safeguardourconstitution.com."

http://www.safeguardourconstitution.com/press-release/pressrelease20100728.html


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: certifigate; lakin; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 621-625 next last
To: Prole

Witness Stanley MacChrystal....


61 posted on 07/29/2010 7:20:16 AM PDT by LexRex in TN ("A republic, if you can keep it.......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Prole

“Notice they are silent whenever it is asked why Obama would spend millions of dollars to shroud his life and LIES from We The People, when a simple public records release would set him back about 12 dollars.”

Actually, that has been answered many times. Birthers serve Obama’s purposes. They make the opposition to Obama look like 911 truthers - wacko conspiracy nuts to be ignored by the large majority of people.

And Obama hasn’t spent millions defending himself. I doubt he personally has spent a single penny.


62 posted on 07/29/2010 7:20:26 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (When the ass brays, don't reply...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Prole; Mr Rogers
Self-important careerists are A-OK with you.

When those careerists are keeping all of us, even clods like you, safe then yes, they're all right with me.

63 posted on 07/29/2010 7:24:17 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers; Jim Robinson
Like most obamanoid shills, you tried to leave out the millions probably spent to hide all background history of your little almost black demigod. The trips to Indonesia and graft paid to hide data there probably exceeds a million by itself.

The quote you used, stupid, was, "Notice they are silent whenever it is asked why Obama would spend millions of dollars to shroud his life and LIES from We The People ..."

Such tactics as you used are solid proof of your loyalties and lack of moral character such that you will lie and dissemble on command. Disgusting slugs like you are all too many now at FR.

64 posted on 07/29/2010 7:27:15 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Dem voters, believing they cannot be deceived, it is impossible to convince them when deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Prole
As drones, they seem more interested in defending the obama and careerist @sshole machinery in all of this.

And you belive in tearing down the military. Lakin, Ehren Watada, Michael New, Yolanda Huett-Vaughan, they're all your heroes.

65 posted on 07/29/2010 7:31:30 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Prole
Notice they are silent whenever it is asked why Obama would spend millions of dollars to shroud his life and LIES from We The People, when a simple public records release would set him back about 12 dollars.

Nobody asked me.

66 posted on 07/29/2010 7:32:41 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Prole
Notice they are silent whenever it is asked why Obama would spend millions of dollars to shroud his life and LIES...

It's just another unfounded birther assertion that keeps getting repeated with no actual proof.

If you work your way back to the original source, you'll discover there is no way to determine if in fact any amount of money has been paid by Obama or his campaign to defend any of the failed birther cases.

67 posted on 07/29/2010 7:33:09 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

Those big buck attorneys worked pro bono for the usurper yeah that’s the ticket/s

Dont try and con us con man.


68 posted on 07/29/2010 7:36:06 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
-- Not under US law. Remember the War of 1812? --

So, you are saying that Obama was not a dual citizen at birth, and in effect, that a person born in the US cannot, today, be a dual citizen at birth.

69 posted on 07/29/2010 7:36:34 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Yeah really! We have a president who refuses to show his birth certificate and when we question the absurdity of this - we are somehow “kooks.”

Don’t we have a FR mole in the Hawaii government who could get this stupid document and post it all over the internet?


70 posted on 07/29/2010 7:37:50 AM PDT by mom.mom (Is it NOVEMBER yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Are you an ex-JAG officer?


71 posted on 07/29/2010 7:38:44 AM PDT by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
The criteria that you assert holds, as a matter of law, makes birth-vacation babies eligible, even when both parents are non-citizens and the child is reared to adulthood in a foreign land.

A Birther successfully grasps a point! (Marks calendar).

When writing laws, one always has to grapple with the fact that rules written for very large groups of people tend to be both over inclusive, and under inclusive, at the same time. Meaning that the rule both penalizes someone who it does not advance the purpose of the rule to penalize (over inclusive), and fails to penalize someone who it would advance the purpose of the rule to penalize (under inclusive). There are any number of Americans who came here as infants, or children, who love this Country, and treasure its ideals, but who are excluded from the Presidency. Conversely, there are any number of Obamas, who hold our values in contempt, and live to undermine them, but who are not excluded from the Presidency.

The Natural Born Citizen clause in the Constitution is both over inclusive, and under inclusive, and does not exclude BO from the Presidency, not withstanding his professed contempt for our values and institutions. Period. That leaves us with the choice of either (1) turning to the clauses of the Constitution requiring elections, and trying to win those elections, or (2) indulging in fantasies that some Court, or the Justice League, or somebody, is going to serve a writ on Obama removing him from office.

72 posted on 07/29/2010 7:47:33 AM PDT by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Pilsner
-- A Birther successfully grasps a point! (Marks calendar). --

I understand the argument my opponent makes, and you toss a gratuitous insult.

Not that you care, but I'll not correspond with you.

73 posted on 07/29/2010 7:53:05 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour; rxsid

Similar to when the judge dropped penalty fines for Mario Apuzzo, risking he would have access to discovery, as a hot potato. Wonder if Orly Taitz could have the same recourse regarding her 20K dollar$$ “fine” hmmmm???


74 posted on 07/29/2010 7:56:30 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
We will see. I suspect you are right. The Army is in a difficult position. It must not question Obamas authority when giving a fair trial to someone questioning Obamas authority. A catch 22 for the Army.

But... if this man has his pension revoked or goes to jail, it opens up a new can of worms. As a matter of politics, He becomes a National Martyr. An Albatross hung on Obamas neck for the next two years, as Lakin files law suit after law suit for damages. At the same time, Obama, like a King, refusing to show his long form. On its face, That is Kenyan-butt-Ugly.

75 posted on 07/29/2010 7:58:30 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Absolutely false. Period.


76 posted on 07/29/2010 8:00:23 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Not only will the case be dropped but he will do time for refusing to go to Afganistan.

How can the case get dropped and still have him sent to prison?

77 posted on 07/29/2010 8:00:29 AM PDT by usmcobra (NASA outreach to Muslims if I were in charge:The complete collection of "I dream of Jeannie" on DVD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
Prove the claim that he spent millions defending birther lawsuits. (Birther blogs simply repeating the claim don't count.)

Beyond a letter signed by Bob Bauer, and payments made to law firms for unspecified work...good luck.

78 posted on 07/29/2010 8:04:21 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: missnry; napscoordinator
The other day Baghdad Bob was asked directly about the usurper's fake S.S.# (Identity theft), but tapped danced for quite awhile not answering the question. Jake Tapper (ABC) demonstratively left his front row seat and went out, while B.B. finally twisted the answer by deceptively changed the subject to the B.C. that HE had posted on the internet for everyone to see, and then he suddenly left the room NOT in any way answer the real question!!!

So the question here is if B.B. has a penis???

79 posted on 07/29/2010 8:08:37 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
...A valid birth certificate would prove, in a legal sense, who his father was. ...

Sure that fact is generally known, but not in a legal sense. Right now, it's just hearsay.

this can't be emphasized enuff

80 posted on 07/29/2010 8:08:45 AM PDT by 1234 ("1984")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 621-625 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson