Sarah made another poor choice in whom she endorsed. It’s unfortunate that, in pursuing her “Mama Grizzly” strategy she is compromising some Conservative principles that I consider non-negotiable.
That isn’t to say that I’m writing Sarah off — only that her strategy is fatally flawed. Ans I’ll criticize her when she’s wrong. 90+% of her endorsements have been dead on RIGHT — as in CONSERVATIVE. But if it comes down to choosing a candidate based on ovaries vs. principles — I’ll take principles, thank you.
Karen Handel is the right choice! Her runoff opponent is a former Democrat shyster that fled the US House only a few steps away from Ethics charges. The Good Ol' Boy inside the beltway former Congressman is corrupt, with no executive experiance to boot, and I'll be proud when Handel trounces him in two weeks.
Nathan Deal exceeded congressional limits on outside income and used his U.S. House office and staff to protect money coming from a no-bid state business deal. On March 29, 2010, the Office of Congressional Ethics released a report concluding that Mr. Deal improperly used his office staff to pressure Georgia officials to continue the state vehicle inspection program that generated hundreds of thousands of dollars a year for his family’s auto salvage business.
Sarah Palin endorsed a strongly prolife woman in this race.
What principles did she compromise?