Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: smoothsailing

I think either she goofed or somebody on her staff goofed. She should have endorsed Eric Johnson (true conservative).


3 posted on 07/28/2010 8:21:05 PM PDT by Tucker822
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tucker822

Unfortunately for Eric, he doesn’t have ovaries, or amnesty credentials like Mccain or Perry.


4 posted on 07/28/2010 8:22:25 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Tucker822

I think she is taking over the Republican Party as a modern Republican and as a Feminist. Both causes are problematic. I am less and less enthused.


41 posted on 07/28/2010 9:31:28 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Tucker822; pissant

From what I’ve heard, Dr. King only stated that Handel presided over a Planned Parenthood grant (which went to breast cancer screening). I don’t think that King ever said that Handel was pro-abortion. Sure, Sarah’s not perfect, but I don’t think she’d endorse (at least knowingly) a pro-abort candidate.

The “pro-choice” bit came from the writer of the title of the article. Maybe the author was trying to bring about a bit of divide and conquer with conservatives.


91 posted on 07/29/2010 2:11:51 PM PDT by Jacob Kell (For he is B. Hussein Obama, King of the RDDBs, and may all lesser RDDBs bow before him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson