To: Grunthor
I was willing to wait until all the evidence was in before sharing my opinion on this case, and as a former cop I do lean toward the police in matters like this HOWEVER, moves like this by the prosecutors office just really stink to high heaven of corruption in order to cover up for a few cops that *ucked up and killed a good man. Were you ever involved in such a public case involving a death that included up to fifty people claiming to be witnesses with different accounts of what they saw?
26 posted on
07/28/2010 7:19:44 AM PDT by
Moonman62
(Politicians exist to break windows so they may spend other people's money to fix them.)
To: Moonman62
“Were you ever involved in such a public case involving a death that included up to fifty people claiming to be witnesses with different accounts of what they saw?”
No, why?
27 posted on
07/28/2010 7:20:58 AM PDT by
Grunthor
(My coffee creamer is fat free because I am not.)
To: Moonman62
The only difference in the accounts I have heard is that some non-LEO witnesses said he ‘didn't have a gun in his hand’ and others said ‘his gun was in his holster’ (for those of you in Rio Linda, that ALSO means it was not in his hand).
So far the only “different accounts” I have seen is that the witnesses do not agree with the LEO’s, who all seem to agree that he DID have a gun in his hand.
30 posted on
07/28/2010 7:27:22 AM PDT by
allmendream
(Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson