Much like American libtard Jews proclaiming they are Jews, they are only so by blood and genes; the same holds true for California Catholics who profess and/or call themselves Catholics, they are only Catholics by name only......=.=
Thisis garbage. The article is oddly written to confuse the issue. I do not believe the numbers.
Not too surprising, this is a common liberal tactic of gradually waring down your moral “shock”. Homo marriage is a good example of this, the first time is was soundly defeated with most people “shocked” that it would even be proposed, the second time it was barely defeated with most people mildly disturbed and the third time it will pass with most peoples approval. Seen it happen on all sorts of “moral” issues and with most churches giving out a relativistic gospel things eventually shift, it just takes a few years and a constant barrage of propaganda. Also, most Catholics that I know pretty much totally disagree with most of the Catholic doctrine and are going just because of tradition.
how did they define catholic?
was it one of those fake churches made for political posturing ala walis or lakoff’s winning with words cults?
These are not Catholics. They are not CINO’s either.
As you are not pregnant partly, or in name only. They may be former Catholics, or unaffiliated Catholics, or even attending a Mass on Christmas, but they are not Catholic. The libs don’t get that. Catholicculture.org doesn’t get this, or they would say so, so it is doubtful they are Catholic either to let this false image stand without Truth.
Title fixed!!
Of course, we’ll be told that these are just “cafeteria Catholics” by Catholics.