***********************************************************************
by M4570D0N
on Mon, 07/26/2010 - 15:02
#489058
+1
I find the Simmons armageddon crowd to be about on the level of the fringe AGW claiming just a few years ago that Greenland's ice sheet already doomed to raise sea levels by 7 meters, that AGW caused Hurricane Katrina, that we should start eating our dogs and have chickens as pets instead (and eat them too) to cut down on GHG emissions, or (my most recent favorite) that early man hunting the wooly mammoth 15,000yrs ago started AGW. Ridiculous claims like these do nothing but impede the progression of intelligent discussion of the issue. It eats away at the credibility of the more level-headed pro-AGW crowd and serves as an affirmation to those that hold all aspects of climate science as nothing but a farce.
(And I realize there is a middle ground, but I'm sure you all get the point)
***********************************************************************************
by AssFire
on Mon, 07/26/2010 - 11:47
#488711
It seems a miracle that our beloved leader was able to convince BP to establish a $20 billion slush (oops, escrow) fund to compensate those hurt by the ongoing oil plume in the Gulf of Mexico. After all, he had no constitutional power to force them to do so; so had to resort to Chicago-style negotiating.
But, let us take a closer look at the effect on BP's finances:
1. BP will establish a $20 billion fund, but will pay only $7 billion into it during 2010.
2. BP is a British corporation, but has a very large operating entity in the U.S.
3. By Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, BP must book the entire $20 billion expense in the year accrued. Therefore, they will book a $20 billion expense in 2010, reducing their U.S. tax liability by $7 billion.
4. Our dear leader also convinced this massive corporation to show their concern for the "small people" by withholding dividends to their shareholders for the last three quarters of 2010. This reduces their outward cash flow by about $7.5 billion, including approximately 40 percent of that amount to U.S. citizens. Assuming the Bush tax cuts will survive through 2010, the U.S. Treasury will lose another $450 million in taxes on that amount. We won't even discuss the effect on the U.S. economy.
Let us review the results:
BP Cash Flow:
Escrow funding ($7 billion)
Dividend saving $7.5 billion
Tax savings $7 billion
Net favorable cash flow : $7.5 billion
US Treasury Tax Receipts:
BP Corporate income tax ($7.5 billion)
BP Shareholders ($0.45 billion)
Net unfavorable tax receipts ($7.95 billion)
I guess we really should expect this. After all, our dear leader is the most inexperienced man in any room he walks into.