Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
and the veto would have been overridden, in a bi-partisan fashion (think McCain, Graham, Snowe, Collins, Voinovich ...)

As mentioned earlier upthread, September 11 changed everything and the number one priority of the Bush administration was the global war on terror and the defense of the country. He determined that he had to choose his battles with the Dems strategically.

"For the record, every alternative budget offered by the Democrats during the Bush years called for more spending and higher taxes than the President's budget." ... Rove: Courage and Consequence, page 237.

41 posted on 07/26/2010 10:27:56 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (Obama is a man-caused disaster..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Servant of the Cross
and the veto would have been overridden, in a bi-partisan fashion (think McCain, Graham, Snowe, Collins, Voinovich ...)

Check your Constitution. It takes 67 votes in the Senate to override a veto. There weren't 15 to 17 Republicans that would vote to override.

As mentioned earlier upthread, September 11 changed everything and the number one priority of the Bush administration was the global war on terror and the defense of the country

And as I said, it wouldn't be hard to find Democrats justifying their spending as being best for the country, because priority one is helping people being hurt by the economy.

So then why not agree that fiscal discipline was the last thing he was interested in, and that to say that his administration was a fiscally responsible era is complete crap?

44 posted on 07/26/2010 11:05:03 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson