Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodBlessTheLittlePeople

‘I think this individual asked the group what information was considered a grave threat to soldiers in the field due to its release. I have yet to hear anyone mention specifics from the files to challenge his claims, but rather kneejerk emotional reactions. “

Kneejerk? The material is marked Top Secret. The proper process is to challenge the classification and have it released through FOIA requests. Anything else is treason.

“You’re entitled to your opinion.”

Opinion backed by federal law and decades of lessons written in blood.

I cannot believe anyone on FR is backing the release of Top Secret military documents.


134 posted on 07/26/2010 1:31:32 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver
Kneejerk? The material is marked Top Secret. The proper process is to challenge the classification and have it released through FOIA requests. Anything else is treason.

Like I said, some of us are interested in hearing the specific to the challenge presented. What specific pieces of information, given their release, necessitate a danger to our troops? Inquiring minds want to know. :-) A government unchecked can call anything it wants treasonous, doesn't mean it's so. I would've thought that the powers from the unPatriot Act that Obama inherited and the nefarious uses he made of it would be evidence of that by now. I cannot believe anyone on FR is backing the release of Top Secret military documents.

Believe it.

135 posted on 07/26/2010 1:37:51 PM PDT by GodBlessTheLittlePeople
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

To: driftdiver; freethinker_for_freedom; GodBlessTheLittlePeople
I cannot believe anyone on FR is backing the release of Top Secret military documents.

Oh come on. This cannot be the first time you've seen trolls on FR.

One of them signed up a year ago. The other signed up a week ago. Between the two of them, their posting history is a quick read. They're both obvious trolls beginning with their first posts and continuing onward.

The one that signed up a year ago has a very interesting posting history. It has taken the liberal stance in nearly every post. It even went so far as to claim Hitler was the man that God intended him to be and "there was nothing particularly evil about him." Those statements are perfectly aligned with the troll's other anti-Semitic and anti-Christian remarks.

163 posted on 07/27/2010 11:10:52 AM PDT by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson