Posted on 07/24/2010 5:22:53 PM PDT by jazusamo
Liberal and environmental activists say that Democrats will not suffer in November because of their failure to pass Senate climate change legislation.
Charles Chamberlain, political director of Democracy for America, an advocacy group founded by former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, said liberal voters are happy that a climate bill sponsored by Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) was shelved.
The reality is that the base didnt have a lot at stake in the climate bill, said Chamberlain.
After the BP disaster, all weve heard from our members, the No. 1 issue is climate change and offshore oil drilling and oil, he said. But we polled our members about whether we should be fighting for the bill and it wasnt even close. The answer was no.
Frank ODonnell, president of Clean Air Watch, a liberal environmental advocacy group, said the Kerry-Lieberman bill was full of gifts to the oil, coal and nuclear industries.
The way they were going to give away free emission permits instead of set up an auction system, which [President] Obama had campaigned on, said ODonnell. That was massive giveaway.
Kerry and Lieberman had also agreed to expand offshore oil and natural-gas drilling before the BP spill made such a concession politically unpalatable.
They werent going to step up to big oil; they were in lockstep with big oil until the disaster hit, ODonnell said.
Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, criticized the Kerry-Lieberman as a policy cave-in to energy companies. He urged Senate Democrats to pass a strong bill regulating offshore drilling.
"Given that the energy bill was already a big capitulation to polluters, the failure to move it will not exacerbate the enthusiasm gap that was already there due to it's underlying lameness, Green said. If Democrats don't pass a gold-standard bill cracking down on polluters after the BP disaster, that's plain political malpractice.
Having set aside climate legislation, Senate Democratic leaders plan to move narrower legislation responding to the Gulf Oil disaster. The measure is expected to place stricter restrictions on drilling and lift the liability cap for companies that cause environmental damage.
President Obama and Democratic leaders in Congress made energy and climate change reform their second-ranking domestic initiative, behind healthcare reform and ahead of immigration reform.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called it her flagship issue.
Their dream of capping the gases blamed for melting polar ice caps and millennia-old glaciers was finally set aside last week when Senate Democrats admitted they didnt have enough votes.
The failure raised the specter that it would further discourage liberal Democratic base voters, who have been described as less eager than conservatives to show up at the polls in November.
Democratic political strategists and independent analysts have described an enthusiasm gap between Republican and Democratic base voters.
Liberal activist leaders predicted winning legislative victories in Congress would be the best way to rev up the party base.
Nothing motivates the base like success; thats what we need, Bob Fulkerson, the state director of the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada, told The Hill earlier this month.
Two weeks later, climate change legislation not to mention comprehensive immigration reform is considered dead for the year.
But environmental advocates and liberal grassroots leaders say the political fallout will be minimal.
Were seeing a lot of enthusiasm from our members and base for lawmakers who are willing to fight special interests, said Ilyse Hogue, director of political advocacy and communications for MoveOn.org, a liberal grassroots advocacy group. We never saw that more than on the climate bill, where Republicans were trying to appease the utilities and oil and gas companies.
Hogue disputed the notion that Democratic base voters are suffering from a lack of enthusiasm. She said they are ready to rally for lawmakers and candidates who will stand up to polluters, Wall Street bankers and other interests.
The death of climate change legislation in the Senate will allow Democratic Party strategists to pin the blame on Republicans.
Because a climate bill will not come to the floor, there will be no way to know for sure how many Democrats would have opposed it. The lack of a floor debate or vote on the legislation may also obscure the concessions to industry that ODonnell of Clean Air Watch and other liberals complained about.
Democratic lawmakers have emphasized the unwillingness of Republicans to negotiate with them on a bill to address global warming.
On Friday, a Democratic Party committee spokeswoman said the collapse of a legislative effort to cap carbon emissions showed a clear difference between Democrats and Republicans.
Republicans have been carrying water for the special interests every step of the way and its no different this time around, said Deirdre Murphy, a spokeswoman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.
Come November, voters will have a choice between Republicans who shill for the special interests or Democrats who have proven they will stand up to the special interests to help the middle class, she said.
A Senate debate on climate change legislation could have widened rifts between liberals and centrist Democrats, a problem that some candidates such as Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) face.
Some Democrats have let us down and are not delivering on progressive ideals and instead are delivering to the same old special interests, like Wall Street, Chamberlain said. Places where there are leaders like Blanche Lincoln, theres a very depressed base.
The reverse is true where strong leaders are standing up to special interests, he said.
Ping!
For folks obsessed with the environment, they don’t seem to know which way the wind is blowing.
Thanks, great video!
there’s a thread from earlier today on it.
Oh, really!?
What needs to go viral is that the Dems in Congress, specifically, the Senate voted to keep the EPA on top of regulating Carbon Dioxide as a pollutant. When they killed the Resolution which would have stripped the EPA of its ability to regulate (and TAX) everything which uses any form of energy which burns fuel and emits CO2, from coal fired power plants to grampa's woodstove to your vehicle to your gas range and hot water heater.
Everything cap and tax could have been, can be done by the EPA without so much as coming up in Congress now.
Be ye not deceived, they've already had their vote.
Yep, that does need to go viral. The Dems are hurting for November whether the lib activists want to admit it or not. When they lose control of Congress they’ll be some changes made for the EPA.
Amazing that Kerry and Gore, two defeated presidential candidates should be in such bad odor these days, Kerry with his $7 million, New Zealand built, tax dodging, seventy foot yacht (Ketch Up?) and Gore with alternating stories about rumored homosexuality, grossing out hotel masseuses, and the dissolution of his marriage. Kerry's name is on the Senate's cap and trade bill, Gore's is indelibly linked to “climate change.” Oh, and Lieberman still sounds either like his morning bran muffin hasn't clicked in yet or the voice "Pat" the Julia Sweeney SNL character.
LOL! Good post.
I especially like Lurch’s yachts name, Ketch Up!
I don’t buy this “It’s dead for this year” crap.
I smell a bait and switch dem bill already in the works.
I suspect that Obama will introduce a small energy bill before the Nov elections which will simply be bashing offshore drilling playing on the anger over the spill, but the bill will be left open till after the Nov elections, then after the dems are sitting on a large lame duck congress, they’ll ram into the bill the ground work for Obama’s cap and tax, including giving the CCX tradefloor exclusive control over all trades.
There is no freakin way the dems are going to give up on 10+ trillion in new taxes/pork masquerading as saving the planet.
Obamacare was just the warmup of the bolshevik takeover of the US, Cap and Tax is one of the key parts of the strategy.
And would be the first ones screaming when they can no longer afford to drive or have electric for all of their electronics!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.