Re: your Al Gore Sex Pervert:
The simple fact is that the one accuser who was finally identified, Ms. Hagerty:
failed a polygraph that a prospective attorney ordered to back up her contentions;
three other attorneys said pass;
Had a record of molestation or attack claims, couldnt get a restraining order after the first story because the judge didnt buy her story
Missed six police appointments at last count, to make charges for those various claims
she went for the gold instead of stopping a sexual predator from attacking others, by either civil or criminal charge;
held up a pair of pants on the cover of the Enquirer insisting that it was The Proof! of semen, when she already knew the results of the test (ranch dressing);
Neither she nor the Enquirer admits that they never produced the evidence that at least 5 million paid to see, yet these dozens of sensational articles all cite that evidence! Thats quite a trick.
And now two anonymous women, whose stories cant be checked by any of the reporters much less the accusers names are being paraded about as if THEY now are the proof
You add all this up and you conclude that he entered an LLC, like thousands of other Americans, thus THAT is proof that he attacked the first one, whose story is falling apart faster than one of his glaciers?
Seriously?
Hey, Ive got a great bridge in Brooklyn. You are the only one I want to sell it to. Al Gore has so many legitimate googs and bombast, especially his movie, that deserve scorn and criticism. You and thousands of others are unfortunately making fools out of yourself drawing conclusions from the Enquirer, which has still not produced evidence that can be verified, but now has introduced two anonymous sensational claims.