Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Says It Has 100 Vessels For Each US Warship
CBS News ^ | July 24, 2010

Posted on 07/24/2010 9:08:35 AM PDT by Strategy

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - A former naval chief in Iran's Revolutionary Guard says his country has set aside 100 military vessels to confront each U.S. warship that poses a threat.

Gen. Morteza Saffari is quoted by the conservative weekly Panjereh Saturday as saying that troops aboard U.S. warships are "morsels" for Iran to target in the event of any American threat against Iran.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: iran; islam; israel; middleeast; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: happinesswithoutpeace

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Cole_bombing#Rules_of_engagement


61 posted on 07/24/2010 10:41:06 AM PDT by happinesswithoutpeace (1.416785(71) x 10^32 frwv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Odd.. I thought he had extensive plastic surgery and changed his name to Robert Gibbs


62 posted on 07/24/2010 10:44:10 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

Iran’s best weapon is the one in the Whitehouse. Doofus in charge.


63 posted on 07/24/2010 10:45:01 AM PDT by Bon mots ("Anything you say, can and will be considered racist...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

64 posted on 07/24/2010 10:46:25 AM PDT by Bon mots ("Anything you say, can and will be considered racist...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

Must be counting speed boats and dinghies.......


65 posted on 07/24/2010 10:53:34 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Would you give a swarm type attack a chance in the restricted waters of the Gulf? There was this article about “rule breaking warfare” and this computer geek kept on winning a naval simulation because he would build a fleet of “dingies” and just overwhelm the more traditional fleets with numbers. What would happen in Iran sent out say 1,000 speed boats packed with explosives on a kamikaze mission against a US task force in the Gulf? It might just take 1% to get through and a US carrier is at the bottom of the gulf.


66 posted on 07/24/2010 11:07:09 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
"US warships have quite enough bombs and missiles and torpedoes to address them all."

Yes, but one should still use them, right? Do you think our withdrawal from Vietnam, Lebanon, Somalia was precipitated by the lack of weapons?

Tactically, it is not a trivial problem to confront 300 speed boats loaded with explosive and attacking our carrier close to their shore. I am afraid that we may lose a carrier under such circumstances quite soon, and the consequences will be enourmous.

67 posted on 07/24/2010 11:16:21 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark

We would see these forces gathering before they ever put out from the pier. Aircraft would be taking some out before they were ever in range of the Phalanx or that other cool looking gun.


68 posted on 07/24/2010 11:21:03 AM PDT by joelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: joelt
"We would see these forces gathering before they ever put out from the pier."

In theory. You can recall, I am sure, the loss of sleeping 240 Marines -- I am sure we should've seen it coming. You may recall successful bombing of our ships a decade ago. There is a huge difference between "we should" and "we will."

69 posted on 07/24/2010 11:25:59 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97lH0-tuuWE


70 posted on 07/24/2010 11:26:36 AM PDT by Wiggins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy
100....99...98...97....96.5....94....


71 posted on 07/24/2010 11:30:39 AM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy
Nutjob is launching 8 of them from his bathtub right now...


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

72 posted on 07/24/2010 11:54:39 AM PDT by The Comedian (Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shamrock498
..supposedly the SeaRam is a missle system which is supposed to improve close in combat capabilities but it is still in development..

It's completed development and has been deployed throughout the Navy fleet. It's known as the RIM-116 and it's designed to destroy hyper-sonic anti-ship missiles along with incoming aircraft. All the carriers have them.

73 posted on 07/24/2010 12:01:27 PM PDT by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
What would happen in Iran sent out say 1,000 speed boats packed with explosives on a kamikaze mission against a US task force in the Gulf? It might just take 1% to get through and a US carrier is at the bottom of the gulf.

I think that your "1%" or more would probably wreck each other in the effort to find a carrier strike group to attack. These carriers don't just go around broadcasting their location for all to know. And if Iran did gather 1000 boats in one location they'd be detected by satellite/Global Hawk/Predator UAV in plenty of time to be destroyed in port.

74 posted on 07/24/2010 12:09:47 PM PDT by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

I was thinking the 69 cent plastic ones you can buy at any cheap kids store.


75 posted on 07/24/2010 12:11:06 PM PDT by Mom MD (Jesus is the Light of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
There were enconters back in the eighties when Iranian speedboats took a run at some US ships. They didn't get too close before being fired upon. But of course then we had an American president, too.
76 posted on 07/24/2010 12:27:53 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

What an ignorant comment. With air supremacy, not to mention weapons supremacy, their little speedboats will be cut to pieces. They’ve played that game before and lost.

Any aggressive act on their part, and I’d make clear that the lose their provinces at the northern end of the Gulf.


77 posted on 07/24/2010 1:31:11 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Procyon
Should be quite effective in turning their vessels into sawdust :)


78 posted on 07/24/2010 3:39:07 PM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

Rowboats aren’t much good against Aircraft Carriers!


79 posted on 07/24/2010 5:20:44 PM PDT by upcountryhorseman (An old fashioned conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tonytitan

read this article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/12/washington/12navy.html

the navy is well aware of this serious threat. this type of attack is not as easily handled as you think


80 posted on 07/24/2010 5:26:36 PM PDT by Shamrock498
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson