Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/24/2010 5:41:48 AM PDT by Michael van der Galien
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Michael van der Galien

She scared them, that’s why. Now......she scares them even more.

For good reason, I may add.


2 posted on 07/24/2010 5:44:13 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

is there a list of the 500 ppl on the list? We NEED TO NAME NAMES! Alinksy tactic. Just shaming journalist is not enough. Noone knows what or who it is. We need NAMES AND FACES


4 posted on 07/24/2010 6:00:21 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

“But in many other exchanges, the Journolisters clearly had another, more partisan goal in mind: to formulate the most effective talking points in order to defeat Palin and McCain and help elect Barack Obama president. The tone was more campaign headquarters than newsroom.”

The mainstream media is defined as a propaganda arm of the DNC and the left wing Obama Administration.

This is just starting to sink into the national consciousness. No wonder they are throwing spitballs from racism to Sherrod to Fox to everything else trying to deflect the obvious:

WE HAVE NO FREE AND INDEPENDENT MAINSTREAM NEWS.


5 posted on 07/24/2010 6:01:39 AM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

Is there a complete list of these Journolisters.

We need to check any writers against the list. Then we will KNOW their bias BEFORE we choose to read anything they have to say.


6 posted on 07/24/2010 6:08:41 AM PDT by Marty62 (marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

If is isn’t “off the record” it is on the record. Har har har.


13 posted on 07/24/2010 6:58:10 AM PDT by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

Isn’t there a law that “in kind” political contributions need to be reported?

Seems to me that a co-ordinted attack on Palin, and a co-ordinated boost of Obama in the media is exactly what is meant by an “in-kind” contribution.

We need some conservative lawyers and investigators.

The fines for this might bankrupt the so-called mainstream media.


15 posted on 07/24/2010 7:25:41 AM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien
Great example of the principle-Patterns don't lie.

That's why the program called “ABLE DANGAER” worked.

It found patterns in information that was in the public domain. It work out the patterns, work the patterns down and was able to put a face and a name to who was creating the patterns.

Several years ago the Bush adm, translated, declassified, and made public some of the al Quada docs. recovered in Afghanistan.

As generally happens in these cases, somebody screwed up. What they thought was a completely irrelevant doc. was in reality the “Rosetta Stone” of the terrorist attacks.

With that doc. anyone above the level of idiot can figure out when a terrorist attack is coming down the pike.

The doc. was a letter from OBL to Mullah Omar. It was listed as doc. #AFGP-2002-600321 in the now removed Harmony database.

In the doc. OBL made a passing comment to the affect, The news is 90% of the preparation for the battle.

If you have a small scale attack, you can carry out the attack based on what is in the news, for a large scale attack you can't, you have to orchestrate the news for it.

From OBL himself, our esteemed news media, our FOURTH ESTATE, is OBL’s fifth column making preparation for the attack.

Want to know when a terrorist attack is coming down the pike?

All you've got to do is work out a PATTERN of the orchestrated news stories that have occurred prior to the previous terrorist attacks. First you work out a pattern to each individual attack, then work out a pattern collectively.

When that pattern of orchestrated news appears, BINGO! You've got a terrorist attack coming down the pike.

Because there is a pattern to the orchestrated news stories, you can use the same principles of ABLE DANGER and work the pattern down to exactly who is responsible for creating the pattern. Again, first individually, then collectively.

You now have the face and the name of who it is collaborating with the terrorist. Or to be more precise, who it is the terrorist are working for.

Before some idiot tries to accuse me of blaming Bush for collaborating with the terrorist, let me remind you Journolist has confirmed beyond any doubt, news stories are being orchestrated for the left benefit.

16 posted on 07/24/2010 7:37:29 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson