Oh my: Palin 28, Romney 18, Gingrich 17, Huckabee 13

Hot Air ^ | 7-23-10 | Allahpundit

[Man50D]

Are you denying that you posted Palin has received as much favorable coverage as negative from the media?

Cite the post.

[GLDNGUN]

Are you denying that you posted Palin has received as much favorable coverage as negative from the media?

Cite the post.

I see you are afraid to answer in the affirmative.

And for good reason...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2553528/posts

Post 30: "The more a politician's name is in the public eye, the more they tend to remember that person come election time. Palin receives as much favorable coverage as she does negative coverage."

That would be you.

"Funny" how I am able to recall your posts better than you.

[Man50D]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2553528/posts Post 30: "The more a politician's name is in the public eye, the more they tend to remember that person come election time. Palin receives as much favorable coverage as she does negative coverage."

Thank you for finally citing the post! A post that was made 11 days ago you expect me to remember off the top of my head is ludicrous. I stand by that comment. You could have supplanted Palin's name with any other name and it still would have been the media trying to steer people towards certain individuals.

[GLDNGUN]

A post that was made 11 days ago you expect me to remember off the top of my head is ludicrous.

Again, funny I can remember what you post, but you can't. Don't you even remember what you believe? If you believe Palin has received as much favorable media coverage as negative why would you need me to prove you said it to back up my "vaccuous" claim? Wasn't so "vaccuous" after all, was it?

Again, to suggest that Palin has received as much positive coverage from the press as negative is beyond absurd. Either you don't have a grip on reality to begin with, or your dislike for her is so strong it's made you incapable of rational thought.

[Man50D]

Again, funny I can remember what you post, but you can't.

That's because you and your fellow Sarahbots are paranoid over any remark against Palin. I seriously doubt you can remember every post you made.

If you believe Palin has received as much favorable media coverage as negative why would you need me to prove you said it to back up my "vaccuous" claim? Wasn't so "vaccuous" after all, was it?

Why didn't you cite the remark in the first place? Citing posts by someone is an unwritten rule and standard procedure when addressing that comment to serve as a reminder and confirm what was posted.

Again, to suggest that Palin has received as much positive coverage from the press as negative is beyond absurd. Either you don't have a grip on reality to begin with, or your dislike for her is so strong it's made you incapable of rational thought.

Careful G, you're starting to use the socialist/marxist strategy. When all else fails and lacking any content, use the Saul Alinsky tactics of isolating a target and then attacking.

[GLDNGUN]

Sorry, it's not my job to remind you what you believe. Or at least it shouldn't be.

Your Alinsky assertion is as absurd as your theory that the media wants Sarah Palin to be the GOP nominee and thus giving her great press.

[Man50D]

Sorry, it's not my job to remind you what you believe. Or at least it shouldn't be.

It is when you claim a person made a statement.

Your Alinsky assertion is as absurd as your theory that the media wants Sarah Palin to be the GOP nominee and thus giving her great press.

Hmmmm, let's see. You claim in post #104 I'm not either dealing with reality or am irrational simply because I don't agree with you but somehow you consider my equating those invectives with Saul Alinsky tactics as absurd. Now who's not making sense? Again, you continue to spin my words to fit your own paranoid thinking my citing polls is directed only at Palin even though they involve more than just Palin. My remark to any media polls regarding potential candidates be they, Palin, Huckabee, Romney, Gingrich etc.. is to steer the electorate towards certain people the media wants to be in the running for 2012.