Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My View: FCC Shoud Not Defend Discredited Media Ownership Rule [allows companies more outlets]
Ground Report ^ | July 23, 2010 | Matt Schafer

Posted on 07/23/2010 4:55:32 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay

Note: A version of this report originally appeard at the media blog Lippmann Would Roll and also at Stop Big Media.

In a blow to local journalism and quality reporting, the Federal Communications Commission is supporting an old media cross-ownership rule that allows companies to own more media outlets in communities across the country.

On Wednesday, the FCC filed a brief with a U.S. appeals court defending the agency’s 2007 decision under former Chairman Kevin Martin to weaken the Newspaper-Broadcast Cross-Ownership (NBCO) Rule.

The Martin NBCO Rule, which was adopted as part of the FCC’s 2006 media ownership review, is marred by procedural irregularities, ambiguous provisions and loopholes — all of which run counter to the rule’s purpose: to protect local communities from media monopolies and to increase diversity in the marketplace of ideas. The watered-down rule allows media outlets to merge based on promises that the FCC cannot monitor or enforce.

Earlier this week a bi-partisan groups of senators reiterated their support for a diverse media system and strong ownership protections. In a letter sent to current FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, Sens. Olympia Snowe [R-ME], Byron Dorgan [D-ND], and Maria Cantwell [D-WA] questioned the wisdom of FCC rule changes in 2003 and 2007 that removed many of the ownership laws that promoted diversity, localism and competition.

(Excerpt) Read more at groundreport.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fcc; fox; mediaownership; nbco
Discredited Media? Fox?

Comments by FP for 2010 FCC Quadrennial Review of Media Ownership Rules

FreePress side bar, Headlines: Why Does Fox News Have More Power Than Any Progressive in the Country? and reported here,
"The only real damage that Fox can do is if they spread their poison to other news stations."

1 posted on 07/23/2010 4:55:34 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Note: Spelling of Shoud (should) carried over & over.


2 posted on 07/23/2010 4:59:56 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

The viewer market likes Fox. Let the little ankle biters proliferate — they will starve themselves out of existence.


3 posted on 07/23/2010 5:12:38 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson