No, because it is not creating a nuisance. If the presence of a specific building is likely to create a situation where it could pose a safety hazard, then it can be prohibited on the basis that it was going to create a nuisance. For instance if the American Nazi Party or the Aryan Nation Church wanted to build a headquarters next to the Simon Weisenthal Museum, I doubt very seriously if the LA City Council would approve it and secondly I don't think it would be struck down as anything other than a reasonable zoning restriction designed to avoid the creation of a nuisance.
Personally I would favor a law which states that all new buildings built within 800 feet of ground zero must have a 40 foot cross attached to the top in memory of the victims of 9/11.
Why is this mosque creating a nuisance while the other one (just as close to the WTC site) is not?
Personally I would favor a law which states that all new buildings built within 800 feet of ground zero must have a 40 foot cross attached to the top in memory of the victims of 9/11.
If you would genuinely support such a law, I hope you don't consider yourself a defender of the Constitution.