Skip to comments.
Harry Reid: Auto Bailout Probably Saved Ford (Imbecile Alert! Ford Didn't Receive Bailout $$)
Real Clear Politics ^
| 07/22/10
Posted on 07/22/2010 10:47:29 AM PDT by MissesBush
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: MissesBush
Yes, he’s probably correct, although for reasons different than he thinks. Of course it helped Ford! It prompted me to examine Ford for my new truck [lovin my new F-150, btw]. Because it would be a cold day in cowboy hell before I EVER by a GM or Chysler product AGAIN!.....Thanks Harry!
2
posted on
07/22/2010 10:50:46 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
("Profiling: The only profile I need is a chalk outline around their dead ass!")
To: MissesBush
Ford should use the not taking bailout money and Reid’s comments in a marketing campaign. Then again, if they did I’m sure the .gov would go after them like they did with Toyota.
3
posted on
07/22/2010 10:50:54 AM PDT
by
mrmeyer
("When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet." Ayn Rand)
To: MissesBush
I know what he means, i.e. the supplier based would have totally collasped.
However, their are many a Ford buyer who refuse to buy GM and many a FORD employees working their tails off to bring it back (yes and some conservatives I know within GM too) that might be pissed at this since it is not the sweat of Harry Reid that will bring thing any of them back via outstanding product...
4
posted on
07/22/2010 10:52:22 AM PDT
by
taildragger
((Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
To: MissesBush
Does not matter, the bottom matter that Rat party is composed of believe him.
5
posted on
07/22/2010 10:52:42 AM PDT
by
Cheetahcat
(Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
To: MissesBush
RE :”
Someone ought to inform Dumbo Reid that without the illegal conversion of TARP funds into an auto bailout done by the Obama cabal ...”
Correction, Try :”Someone ought to inform Dumbo Reid that without the illegal conversion of TARP funds into an auto bailout done by the Obama/Bush cabal ...”
6
posted on
07/22/2010 10:53:04 AM PDT
by
sickoflibs
( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
To: MissesBush
Reid is dumber than a bag of hammers.
The only creature that is dumber than Reid is the moron that keeps voting to keep this twit in office.
7
posted on
07/22/2010 10:53:22 AM PDT
by
Howie66
(I can see November from my house.)
To: MissesBush
When Ford is the last American auto maker, it will be counted as one saved. The Fascists will get them too, if this administration is not stopped.
8
posted on
07/22/2010 10:54:11 AM PDT
by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know .F Trp 8th Cav)
To: MissesBush
Give the guy a break.
It’s hard to keep the companies you’ve nationalized straight when you’re so busy transforming America into a socialist state.
To: MissesBush
Arguably, the bail out hurt Ford by subsidizing competition and making it harder to raise money by the example of riding roughshod over bankruptcy laws.
Besides disregarding the legal position of GM and Chysler’s creditors, the government intervened to prop up the warrantees issued on GM and Chysler cars, which would have been worthless otherwise. Imagine trying to sell a GM product with no meaningful warantee?
10
posted on
07/22/2010 10:55:34 AM PDT
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
To: MissesBush
Saved Ford, huh? How about Ford was able to manage itself without the tender mercies of a genius like Reid helping them. The fun part comes when Ford files an anti trust lawsuit against the UAW for its monopolistic position of owning auto manufacturing and representing auto workers. What happens when Ford goes non-union Harry?
To: sickoflibs
Bush didn’t push an auto bailout using TARP funds. That was entirely the Obama team’s mendacity. Yes Bush got TARP. It never included an auto bailout.
12
posted on
07/22/2010 10:57:37 AM PDT
by
MissesBush
(Stay angry--right through November)
To: MissesBush
And results of the surge in Iraq in 2008 are obviously to Obama’s credit...
13
posted on
07/22/2010 10:58:49 AM PDT
by
alecqss
To: MissesBush
14
posted on
07/22/2010 11:01:53 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: mrmeyer
Ford should use the not taking bailout money and Reids comments in a marketing campaign. Have you noticed that Ford's television advertising targets Honda and Toyota (I think) as competitors, and completely ignores GM and Chrysler?
15
posted on
07/22/2010 11:01:59 AM PDT
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: taildragger
I know what he means, i.e. the supplier based would have totally collasped. I think that's unlikely. The supply network would have still functioned, but would have been downsized to some extent. Chapter 11 wouldn't necessarily have meant they were stiffed on being paid outstanding debts. Debts would have just been reorganized. In fact, the bailout probably did more harm to suppliers than chapter 11 because priority creditors were stiffed under the bailout plan while the UAW was given premier debter status.
16
posted on
07/22/2010 11:02:32 AM PDT
by
MissesBush
(Stay angry--right through November)
To: ArrogantBustard
Yes I have. Perhaps the management at Ford doesn’t want to rock the boat with the UAW since they pretty much were given majority stake in GM by the marxist in chief & co.
17
posted on
07/22/2010 11:03:52 AM PDT
by
mrmeyer
("When brute force is on the march, compromise is the red carpet." Ayn Rand)
To: MissesBush
After buying GM products for years (last in 2001), I'm done with them, and Chrysler. I really hate that Chrysler got caught up in this government crap, as the past few years they're the only one with any really innovative designs in cars...but, what the hey...I'm no teenager anymore, and cars are now about safety, economy, independence, convenience, and transportation....PRIVATE transportation.
As another poster said, the reason Ford is thriving has nothing to do with the TARP money, except they regime managed to totally alienate the public from GM/Chrysler products. They shot off their own foot.
Many people I know are taking it a step further and vowing to buy vehicles only from companies that are non-union. I can see their point too...especially since unions are obama's Chia Pets.
You cannot PUSH a rope...obama has yet to learn that simple fact of life. Dealing with, and trying to organize America is quite different than organizing a community where all of the residents already agree with BEFORE the meeting starts, and even moreso as the candy is passed out.
18
posted on
07/22/2010 11:04:01 AM PDT
by
FrankR
(It doesn't matter what they call us, only what we answer to....)
To: kbennkc
When life gives you Edsels, make lemonade.
19
posted on
07/22/2010 11:06:57 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
To: MissesBush
Is he crazy or what? Ford didn’t receive a bailout that we know of.
20
posted on
07/22/2010 11:09:32 AM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson