Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jessduntno

So what’s to keep a state from just changing the law back and forth from election to election depending on the standing of their preferred candidate at the time.


8 posted on 07/21/2010 12:01:55 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: circlecity

100% nothing


12 posted on 07/21/2010 12:03:07 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: circlecity
So what’s to keep a state from just changing the law back and forth from election to election depending on the standing of their preferred candidate at the time.

This is already what the crooks in the Bay state do to keep Democrats in office. Recall the changes to filling vacancies back and forth.

20 posted on 07/21/2010 12:06:58 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: circlecity

Nothing.

And it has already happened. See Scott Brown election.

In fact I am shocked that the Democrats haven’t changed the succession law back to governor appoinment for remainder of term.


52 posted on 07/21/2010 12:19:25 PM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: circlecity

Exactly!


60 posted on 07/21/2010 12:28:12 PM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson