To: Ballygrl
Let them babble on... Because apparently they’re too stupid to understand that Fox is not a “broadcaster” but a network, therefore not subject to licensing - of FCC control.
It’s wonderful when ‘journalists’ (et al) put their ignorance on display for all to see...
4 posted on
07/21/2010 9:42:26 AM PDT by
snarkbait
(<<For Rent>>)
To: snarkbait
It’s wonderful when ‘journalists’ (et al) put their ignorance on display for all to see...Indeed....unfortunately, judging by the last 2 election cycles, they have a mass following of ignorance with which to tap into.
To: snarkbait
Fox is not a “broadcaster” but a network, therefore not subject to licensing - of FCC control.
The Fox Network (News Corp.) does own local affiliates whose broadcast licenses are controlled by the FCC.
42 posted on
07/21/2010 11:35:48 AM PDT by
TexanByBirth
(Obama should quit judging the 48% that did not vote for him by the mental capacity of those that did)
To: snarkbait
Because apparently they’re too stupid to understand that Fox is not a “broadcaster” but a networkNot only that, but they are on Cable which does require a license, only local broadcasters require a license.
50 posted on
07/21/2010 12:59:29 PM PDT by
itsahoot
(Republican leadership got us here, only God can get us out.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson