[GOPJ]

...how about the LAW professor who thinks the FCC can pull Fox's license? Fox does not have a license. The FCC does not grant Fox its right to exist. And this guy teaches law.

Rush understands liberal hatred - the law prof thinks we're already living in his totalitarian dream world where conservatives are sent off to camps and their rights to free speech are shut down.

We're not there yet - and with Rush and Fox on our side, maybe we'll never have a totalitarian state forced down our throats.

[precisionshootist]

“We’re not there yet - and with Rush and Fox on our side, maybe we’ll never have a totalitarian state forced down our throats.”

OR

Maybe we won’t have to do to the second group of tyrants what we did to the first group!

[BamaAndy]

Send him an email at: zasloff@law.ucla.edu

Below is a copy of mine:

How exactly would the government yank Fox off the air? I am unclear about that one given our 1st amendment rights.
I would rather think we should look into allowing NPR to compete in an open marketplace rather than relying on government subsidies for a communication vehicle that is not limited to emergency broadcasts. Shoot, the entity may thrive.

It may not do so well. I guess it depends on the ratings. Alas to generate ratings and attract advertising dollars, it has to build credibility much like news services and papers must work to demonstrate factual accuracy. They are doing well, yes, no?

In all sincerity,
a fellow journalist and novelist who uses the name Hunter Ayers on occassion.

[Cheerio]

We're not there yet - and with Rush and Fox on our side, maybe we'll never have a totalitarian state forced down our throats.

I would make a bet that these two items are on the minds of the Marxists every single waking hour. If only they could pull it off, and don't think for a moment they are not working on accomplishing it day and night. They fear a backlash if they had the FCC shut down either one.