Skip to comments.
Media Liberals on 'JournoList' Plotted to Bury the Jeremiah Wright Story in 2008
Newsbusters ^
Posted on 07/20/2010 8:02:44 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Ta Da!
To: Sub-Driver
2
posted on
07/20/2010 8:06:47 AM PDT
by
IrishCatholic
(No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
To: Sub-Driver
The stinking radical hippies of the 60s are all now metro-sexual propagandist.
To: Sub-Driver
4
posted on
07/20/2010 8:11:45 AM PDT
by
avacado
To: Sub-Driver
5
posted on
07/20/2010 8:13:51 AM PDT
by
avacado
To: Sub-Driver
The facts are truly incidental to these people.
I would not go to the MSM for news if my life depended on it.
6
posted on
07/20/2010 8:14:10 AM PDT
by
SMARTY
("What luck for rulers that men do not think." Adolph Hitler)
To: Sub-Driver
I am of the opinion the major media liberals are a communist front group.
To: Sub-Driver
This isn't just a case of groupthink, this is open and deliberate collusion designed to deceive and manipulate. And it worked just fine. There is, to be sure, a certain dismay among these same people that abusing it that way means that it might not work so well next time.
These are the people who have called the Tea Party racist. Not because they believe it, but because they think it will be effective. The firestorm they've started is not likely to end in November.
To: Sub-Driver
Stephanopoulos asked, Do you think Reverend Wright loves America as much as you do?... That's tough questioning? Baloney. That just gave Obama an "out". Obama could then avoid what Wright had actually said and concentrate on how much Wright "loved" America and how only evil right-wingers would question his love, Blah,blah,blah. It also gave the media heads something else to talk about rather than what Wright is actually saying.
9
posted on
07/20/2010 8:20:26 AM PDT
by
techcor
(I hope Obama succeeds... in becoming a one term president.)
To: screaminsunshine
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
Read on the house floor on january 10 1963 by A. S. Herlong, JR. of Florida.
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
10
posted on
07/20/2010 8:20:58 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: avacado
Guy looks like a little sh!t.
11
posted on
07/20/2010 8:25:41 AM PDT
by
Fido969
("The hardest thing in the world to understand is income tax." - Albert Einstein)
To: Sub-Driver
What is necessary is to raise the cost on the right of going after the left. In other words, find a rightwingers [sic] and smash it through a plate-glass window. Take a snapshot of the bleeding mess and send it out in a Christmas card to let the right know that it needs to live in a state of constant fear. Obviously I mean this rhetorically. What a sick fantasy. It's exactly as I've been telling you, frinds - these people are monsters - killers without conscience. This is how they truly think. None of them - I repeat: NONE of them - are fit to live in a free society. How many of you think you can reason, negotiate or compromise with people like this?
As the Old West saying goes, "Some people just need killin'"
12
posted on
07/20/2010 8:27:45 AM PDT
by
Noumenon
("Upon what meat doth this our Caesar feed, that he has grown so great?" - Julius Caesar)
To: screaminsunshine
Major media liberals ARE a communist front group!
I have to get my thoughts and research together on this, but if you look back at the 1950s, the “red scare” was on target. It took the creeps 55 or 60 years to tear down the “red scare” concept and make it look foolish and uncool.
60 years ago, these neo-creeps would have been called before congress and forced to explain their un-American sympathies.
Not now — the communists of the 1950s are now seen as victims, and not only that, but “cool” victims.
BUT THEY WERE AND ARE UN-AMERICAN!!!
13
posted on
07/20/2010 8:35:54 AM PDT
by
duckworth
(Perhaps instant karma's going to get you. Perhaps not.)
To: techcor
He did get right the part about Stephie being a “rat”.
14
posted on
07/20/2010 8:37:39 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: cripplecreek
Thanks for reposting the 1963 communist goals.
Can’t be posted enough! There’s still folks that, when I show them this list, still can’t believe it.
Until they start doing the research...
15
posted on
07/20/2010 9:33:20 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: screaminsunshine
They are, but worse thatn that is they don’t know it. If you engage them to discus communism, they don’t know the first thing about it.
I call it second-stage communism — like the secondary phase of syphilis, when the symptoms disappear.
16
posted on
07/20/2010 9:34:18 AM PDT
by
kabumpo
(Kabumpo)
To: Sub-Driver
one of my 'favorite' quotations (among many gems) from this list of leftist poseur scumbags:
"...let me tell you it was no fun, as a feminist and a woman, waving aside as politically irrelevant and part of the vast rightwing conspiracy Paula, Monica, Kathleen, Juanita, Pollitt said."
This is what they are ALL about, ruthless "the end justifies any means" corruption of US and world politics. Who cares what our (leftists') supposed 'commitments' were yesterday -- if we (leftists) need to defend the indefensible for our 'cause' then just watch our mental gyrations and back-flips as we do "whatever it takes"....
One of the most repugnant features of the left: ANYTHING will be acceptable when you're on the 'team' but anyone who is not one of 'us' will be destroyed.
17
posted on
07/20/2010 9:38:45 AM PDT
by
Enchante
("The great enemy of clear language is insincerity." -- George Orwell --)
To: Sub-Driver
Anyone know of link that has all the names on the JournoList?
18
posted on
07/20/2010 9:43:18 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Still voteless in NY-29. Over 250 roll call votes missed and counting...)
To: Noumenon
What is necessary is to raise the cost on the right of going after the left. Some thoughts:
The "new left" we see today is not like the left of old, say before 1965, IMO. The new left is a bunch of radicalized panzies. Ackerman loves to spew his vile from a sterlized ivory tower. Not much risk or pain in that. Ask him to organize a march of like-minded lefties onto Washington DC and, alas, he will suddenly be late for his monthly wine tasting meeting (images of Glenn Beck with smoking pipe in his mouth)
Ackerman seems to be a red diaper baby or a son of a red diaper baby.
I believe his statement here (What is necessary...)actually exposes how to attack lefties like him! Try reading it again and transposing "right" and "left". Now, would this be his real nightmare - to live in a constant state of fear of the right? - Rhetorically speaking that is.
I think Ackerman is getting more paranoid and desperate.
FWIW
19
posted on
07/20/2010 9:45:55 AM PDT
by
VRW Conspirator
(George W. Bush was the last conservative democrat)
To: Sub-Driver
Another Day in Liberal Land.
20
posted on
07/20/2010 9:46:53 AM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson