I never claimed it was SSPX “dogma”
As for the rest of your statements regarding Williamson and the holocaust denial?
Well - let’s just say that I’ll leave it right there.
I am now bowing out of this conversation.
Have a nice evening.
For anyone who simply thinks Williamson got his numbers wrong - or that his count was a little inaccurate, let’s please review.
He said “not one”.
He said there were no gas chambers.
Shheeeshh!
What freakin’ waste of time this has been!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6C9BuXe2RM
I never claimed it was SSPX “dogma”
My apologies if I misunderstood you. Earlier you countered to a point of mine that there was no tea party "dogma" which caused me to believe that you were stating that such was in fact dogma in the case of the SSPX. Again, sorry if I misunderstood.
As for the rest of your statements regarding Williamson and the holocaust denial?
Well - let’s just say that I’ll leave it right there.
I am now bowing out of this conversation.
Have a nice evening.
I will certainly respect your desire to bow out, but perhaps you will tolerate one more comment from me on this. I would like to point out that your comments here, and what they imply, seem very much like what I am speaking about. Not only are people absolutely certain that Williamson is informed entirely by hatred for Jews, the mere question about how certain we can be on this leads you to respond as if I were also of like mind. Why is this? Should nothing more than a desire not to assume things beyond my knowledge really cause someone to be offended?
I am concerned in this with accuracy, honesty and charity. I do not know Williamson. I cannot speak to his heart, though I can respond to his comments on history. I have not defended his view as accurate, but rather to the contrary have denied it outright. And yet my unwillingness to condemn not just his ideas, which I have, but also his motives, which I am entirely ignorant of, as are all besides the bishop himself and God, seemingly cause you to respond as if I were myself some sort of bigot.
And, to conclude, please consider that I am also not ascribing anything to you here, but speaking only about what is implied in the context and the way you are responding above. If you meant other than I have understood, then again, I apologise.