Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tolsti2

So, the only limit on the government is checks and balances?

Okay, so when a simple majority of the people elects a congress and a president that arer sympathetic to, say, denying a minority segment of the population certain rights - and the courts too are sympathetic - the government can “legally” take away my rights?


102 posted on 07/20/2010 5:41:20 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: An.American.Expatriate

Sure, they did with prohibition. And it had to be returned via the same method is was installed. Amendments are the ultimate ‘do anything you want’ card.

They can do it other ways as well, try buying a machine gun made since 1986 without a class 3 license for instance.


104 posted on 07/20/2010 5:42:52 AM PDT by Tolsti2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: An.American.Expatriate

To quote Rush “Elections matter”.

This is why.


107 posted on 07/20/2010 5:46:39 AM PDT by Tolsti2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson