Skip to comments.
Cell phones: Theft dressed up as charity
Waterbury Republican-American ^
| July 16, 2010
| Editorial
Posted on 07/16/2010 11:23:34 AM PDT by Graybeard58
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: jamndad5; Biggirl; rejoicing; rightly_dividing; iopscusa; kalee; Lovergirl; the invisib1e hand; ...
Let me know if you want on or off this Republican-American Editorial ping list.
2
posted on
07/16/2010 11:25:01 AM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(We couldn't keep the commandments when there was only ONE!)
To: Graybeard58
Odd, I don’t have a cell phone.
To: Graybeard58
It’s all about income redistribution. They may call it a program to help people, but it’s taking money from those who work hard to earn money and give it to those who vote democrat.
Everything in politics is about income redistribution.
To: Graybeard58
The irony is that if the cell phone company told me clearly up front that they were going to charge me an extra couple dollars a month to provide free cell phones to demonstrably poor people, I’d probably agree. Its the arrogance of statutory compulsion that ruins it.
To: Graybeard58
A free cell phone recipient:
"Most people use cell phones to find jobs to get off welfare . . ."This guy could buy the Brooklyn Bridge.
To: Graybeard58
"that cell phones are not luxuries but necessities, as basic to modern life as electricity."
nonsense. There are millions who don't have cell phones in this country and still get along. There is no one in this country who doesn't use electricity in some form.
To: Graybeard58
I am guessing the free menthol cigarettes and free 40 ounce malt liquor promotions did not go well either.
8
posted on
07/16/2010 11:34:11 AM PDT
by
FormerACLUmember
("Subtlety is not going to win this fight": NJ Governor Chris Christie)
To: Graybeard58
Cell phones are a Constitutional right! It’s right under that clause that explains the right to kill babies.
9
posted on
07/16/2010 11:44:55 AM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(We couldn't keep the commandments when there was only ONE!)
To: Graybeard58
Trackphone is owned by Mexican robber baron Carlos Slim. It’s a Mexican company.
10
posted on
07/16/2010 11:55:18 AM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
11
posted on
07/16/2010 12:16:18 PM PDT
by
rockinqsranch
(Liberalism draws criminals as excrement draws flies. Liberals are only good for bait.)
To: Graybeard58
My Tracfone costs $100 a year...no monthly fees. The phone was thrown in for free
12
posted on
07/16/2010 12:20:06 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: Graybeard58
Thanks for the ping Graybeard. Let ‘em pay for their own damned phones. So many on the welfare circuit live to milk the Socialist parts of the system for anything whether they need it or not.
13
posted on
07/16/2010 12:20:06 PM PDT
by
rockinqsranch
(Liberalism draws criminals as excrement draws flies. Liberals are only good for bait.)
To: Graybeard58
well how else ya gonna text in your votes for American Idol?
To: Graybeard58
Hmmm... I'll have to find another no-contract prepaid service. Darn.
Carriers such as TracFone also get to pass the cost via a monthly charge of $2 a month on the bills of regular customers.
Is this a result of Al Gore (he invented the internet!) pushing the "Gore Tax" A.K.A. the universal access fee on all of our phone bills?
(I still kvetch about the Gore Tax every time I open a phone bill. The Mrs. tries to get to them first so she doesn't have to listen to me. I guess I should be thankful the woman hasn't smothered me in my sleep.)
15
posted on
07/16/2010 1:32:39 PM PDT
by
Peet
(<- A.K.A. the Foundling)
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
I have a cell phone but no landline. I save money (and aggravation) that way.
16
posted on
07/16/2010 1:45:26 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: Slings and Arrows
To me, having a cell phone would be aggravation. People could call me wherever I am, interrupting dinners, movies, time out with friends, not to mention feeling the pressure to answer while driving, thus compromising my safety by additional distraction.
Nope, for me, you can catch me at home or send me an e-mail that I keep open all the time at home or in the office.
Being at constant armlength for anyone who has my number seems way too stressful and aggravating for me.
To: Graybeard58
If companies want to help the poor, they should take the money out of their own hides, not their customers." Where does Kevin think corporations' money comes from ... a hole in the ground? Every cent of revenue came from the *customers*, no matter how the accounting is done.
18
posted on
07/16/2010 2:02:13 PM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("It's a jungle out there, kiddies: have a very fruitful day!")
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
People could call me wherever I am, interrupting dinners, movies, time out with friends, not to mention feeling the pressure to answer while drivingYou turn it off if you don't care to receive calls.
19
posted on
07/16/2010 2:03:22 PM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("It's a jungle out there, kiddies: have a very fruitful day!")
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
My cellphone only rings when I am called by someone on my whitelist, and I only whitelist people I actually want to talk to. Everyone else is automatically (and silently) shunted to voicemail.
20
posted on
07/16/2010 2:04:27 PM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson