I don’t think there is a profound disagreement. See, there you go personalizing your comments again. At least this time, you actually explain why you don’t care for the Bishop. However, after reading the article this thread is based on, I don’t understand how you conclude that he is “trumpheting his own interpretation of social justice, which many justifiably consider a variant of socialism.”
You must have gathered this from some past incident(s) and not the current one. Pertinent to the article, both livius and myself have pointed out simply that his Congressional testimony on illegal immigration is an improvement over what we have heard from the bishops previously.
I’ll let you have the last word. Bye.