Posted on 07/15/2010 10:39:58 AM PDT by HorowitzianConservative
Bill O’Reilly is clearly continuing his shameless and cowardly surrender to Sharia Law. Daily on his program, The O’Reilly Factor on FoxNews.com, he engages in the standard and phony obfuscations about the jihadi threat the West faces, consistently refusing to honestly name and label the Islamic foundations of the terrorist enterprise. Back in April 2010, he blatantly sided with our society’s dhimmis, blaming South Park for doing the Mohammed shows. Rather than praising Parker’s and Stone’s courage, standing up for their right to make any script they wished, and denouncing the despots who threatened their lives (and the tenets of the Islamic religion that sanction such threats), O’Reilly publicly promoted submitting to Sharia Law, thereby surrendering to the forces who killed filmmaker Theo van Gogh.
Now, this past Tuesday, on his July 13 program, O’Reilly hit a new low, making a grotesque statement about the millions of suffering persecuted Muslim women around the world. In a bizarre debate with Laura Ingraham about France’s move to ban the burqa, O’Reilly flippantly jokes about a tragic and deadly reality in which any serious, sensitive person would find nothing laughable.
With great self-satisfaction, O’Reilly teases Ingraham about “rooting for the French” while mind-bogglingly siding against the French ban. He makes a disparaging reference to “the Western eye” to imply that forced veiling is only oppressive through our Western lens — as though there is no universal standard of human rights. Priding himself on being for “tolerance” and, therefore, for being in favor of allowing Muslim women to veil, he affirms that “most” Muslim women want to veil themselves.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsrealblog.com ...
He’s from New York, what do you expect?
He is a Democrat and a Obama supporter,so what else is new?
or who knows what else might just pop up unless he toes the line. Yawn. He's good on somethings and is a faux libertarian/ populist. He's out for himself and good for him. Free country and capitalism. I just never confused him for a patriot. Just a man chasing a buck and which one of us wouldn't do what he does if he could.? I couldn't cause I'm not wired to eat sh@t for money.
Well, a Saudi Prince owns 7% of R. Murdochs Newscorp, which includes Fox News. Since the mathematical principle, the Pareto Principle, says that only 4% of any total can influence a larger 64% part of the whole, and demonstrably does so in almost any arena applied to, then the Islamic influence will be out of proportion to the actual ownership. So it seems here. Jos. Farahs’ non-mathematical comment is below. It seems Fox News is NOT OBJECTIVE regarding Islamic/Muslim reporting in a traditional, Western journalistic sense.
“FARAH: There’s a flaw, a real compromise in Fox that you need to understand. And if you care about national security, you especially need to be attentive to it. And that is that Fox News parent company is News Corp has a significant ownership by a Saudi prince that many of you will be familiar with because right after 9/11 this prince very famously offered Rudolph Giuliani a big multi-million dollar check to rebuild and Giuliani told him to stick the check where the sun don’t shine because this guy was basically blaming America for what happened on 9/11. Well this guy owns a very significant percentage of the News Corp and has let the world know that he can get things taken off Fox News when he finds them objectionable and has in the past. And I really believe this is really dangerous for America.”
BOR is a self reverential fluff boy for Beelzebama and his Fraudi handlers..
Used to watch and like O’R.
No longer.
Our Constitution is based on Individual Rights. If a women wants and are not forced to wear a mask, so be it. But if a store owner puts up a sign: no shirt, no shoes, no mask, no service, that’s the store owner’s right.
We lose our freedoms when we ask or force the government to regulate it one way or the other.
No one takes O’Reilly seriously **as a conservative**. Conservatives do not bash someone (Palin, most recently) for opposing amnesty. Conservatives do not hallucinate that “everbody knows” that Big Oil’s members conspire to fix gasoline prices.
Etc., etc.
I can’t take more than a few minutes of O’Reilly anymore, even for laughs. He’s just so damned stupid and pompous I can’t take it.
I did the same thing! He’s not the same guy he used to be and He has become a waste of time. He thinks HE KNOWS IT ALL ABOUT EVERYTHING!!!
Why just an excerpt?
Is this copyrighted material?
Just a blog, and no excerpting required.
Please stop.
Also, if you have an “in” with Mr. Horowitz, tell him he’s a good guy but his blog is defective. Popups and text blockers and flash are NOT legitimate characteristics of an information dissemination medium.
Please use FR’s cleaner environment to post content. Surely, your objective is to participate in FR, and not to just drive traffic.
Good God, that blog is obnoxiously hard to look at!
There is a freakin’ pop up in the middle of the screen!
Why can’t you post the whole article here?
Freakin’ pimp!
He’s fallen way to deeply in love.........WITH HIMSELF! The other night he let Alan Colmes get away with the false accusation of spitting on congressmen. He very calmly said “That didn’t happen” then went on to something else. He should have slammed Colmes.
Can’t stand to watch him and can’t stand to watch Hannity or to listen to Hannity on the radio. I was channel surfing on the radio two days ago and he had a black doctor on talking about her love for the tea party. Naturally before she’s finished he cuts her off, says “thank you” and went into a live commercial. You could tell he hadn’t heard a word she’d said. I changed the station again.
Fox needs to start grooming some replacements.
Great link. Why didn't you actually post the article?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.