Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/15/2010 10:26:14 AM PDT by Thanatos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Thanatos

Don’t bother. Let them play in the shallow end of the pool. For every positive they generate, they are creating 100 negatives.


2 posted on 07/15/2010 10:30:34 AM PDT by JPG (Mr. Gore, or is it Mr. Stone or Mr. Woody? Whatever, you're under arrest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thanatos

To the extent that it keeps the New Black Panther/Holder/JustUs-dept story in the top fold, I’d hope they keep it up. The claim rings hollow, and normal folks see that as plain as day.


3 posted on 07/15/2010 10:32:22 AM PDT by C210N (0bama, Making the world safe for Marxism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thanatos

I think they can sue “Think Progress” for that lovely video they just posted about racism in the Tea Party. Unfortunately, it featured mostly Libs pretending to be tea partiers. OOPS!


4 posted on 07/15/2010 10:32:25 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thanatos

There is no head of the TEA party, no Institution of the TEA party...

How can they sue?


5 posted on 07/15/2010 10:34:07 AM PDT by Freddd (CNN is down to Three Hundred Thousand viewers. But they worked for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thanatos

Don’t give them (or Obama) the publicity. Keep working on November and 2012.


6 posted on 07/15/2010 10:35:36 AM PDT by Clock King (Ellisworth Toohey was right: My head's gonna explode.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thanatos
You want to limit political speech? That's something Kagen favors.

It would be more productive to point out obvious racism in the NAACP accusation. There are more blacks in the Tea Party than whites in the NAACP, I would think.

8 posted on 07/15/2010 10:37:57 AM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thanatos

I think proving group defamation is pretty difficult in the courts. An individual within the Tea Party who is personally defamed would have a better chance.


9 posted on 07/15/2010 10:39:26 AM PDT by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thanatos
Two words:

Public figure.

10 posted on 07/15/2010 10:40:57 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thanatos

Let them talk: it’s the best advertising Republicans have right now.


11 posted on 07/15/2010 10:43:28 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thanatos

No. There is no “Tea Party” any more than “Cyclists” could sue for libel over “hogging the roads”. it’s an inclination, not an incorporation.


13 posted on 07/15/2010 10:46:57 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thanatos

I dont there is a lawsuit here. The tea party umbrella is so large that the racism charge cannot be understood to apply to a particular person or group. The general concept in libel law is that a group larger than 25 people cannot sue for defamation (for example “all Walmart clerks are crooks” is not actionable as I understand the law.)

A named organization might be able to sue (e.g. a specific nonprofit organization) but in this case there are hundreds of tea party groups. The resolution does not single out a specific group.

Please understand I am not a lawyer, just someone who has been reading the paper for a long time.


14 posted on 07/15/2010 11:06:08 AM PDT by freespirited (There are a lot of bad Republicans but there are no good Democrats.--Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thanatos

Left out a word. That should say I dont think there is a lawsuit here.


15 posted on 07/15/2010 11:07:37 AM PDT by freespirited (There are a lot of bad Republicans but there are no good Democrats.--Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thanatos

NAACP = The Black KKK. They can’t help but step in it.


18 posted on 07/15/2010 11:13:46 AM PDT by RingerSIX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thanatos

Did the NAACP call anyone racist by name?


20 posted on 07/15/2010 11:18:40 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thanatos
WHO are the Tea Party Organization???

If someone or someones are claiming to BE the organization, I think we all know they are wrong. There is no Organization and we don't want an organization.

We are only a spontanious group of people who just show up, and if some of those people just show up who happen to be a LEFTIST to make us look bad, not our fault.

WE have NO leaders. That fact is what is driving the LEFT crazy, they can't find out who we really are, rofl.

OK, yes there are those that do the planning for the events, but thats all they are, Event PLANNERS.

21 posted on 07/15/2010 11:50:21 AM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thanatos
I was wondering if it is possible that the Tea Party can sue for Slander and Libel, the NAACP???

Probably not since the Tea Party is a grassroots organization that has no official leadership or organization. It would be like water trying to sue land . . . .

22 posted on 07/15/2010 11:54:19 AM PDT by DustyMoment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Thanatos

They can sue, but they need to show some damages. Being discredited by the NAACP is an honor, not a discredit. They increased the value of the Tea Party.


25 posted on 07/15/2010 2:15:19 PM PDT by TommyDale (Independent - I already left the GOP because they were too liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson