Posted on 07/13/2010 7:42:37 PM PDT by NoLibZone
Illegal immigration is at the centre of a renewed American debate. Arizona's Governor Jan Brewer recently signed SB1070, also known by the cheerful misnomer "Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act." At present, immigration is regulated by federal law. SB1070 will give the state of Arizona special powers to enforce this. It allows police to question a person's legal status when reasonable suspicion exists that the person is not an American citizen.
Their "illegal" status is the primary accusation against Mexican immigrants. But Father Charlie argues that this is a bureaucratic documentation problem, not a criminal act. "We are talking about paperwork, not a crime. By calling an undocumented worker a criminal, you put them in the same category as a rapist or burglar. This is our lowest moment. To vilify people for who they are, not what they have done."
(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...
No but the democrat party makes it possible for THEM TO VOTE...
Even tho they are not citizens.. to wit; more political power..
Two words...>> MOTOR VOTER...
They become VOTERS knucklehead...
Is America a communist country? We’re led by one. Our Congress is led by several. We’re putting all kinds of officals in office who are communist by belief.
Just because there’s more than a few isolated cases in the Church, doesn’t mean they get to define the Church. The Church is primarily about helping the sinner get Salvation thru Grace. Any other thing that does the opposite is Satan’s work, not the Church’s; not God’s.
Aren't most of the South American Priests behind the social justice movement Jesuits? Just asking.
Your statement has nothing do with voters and all to do with numbers. Nice try to rescue an asinine statement, but the “RCC” could care less about voters in a particular country, even in your own analysis. In your dark and dipshit mind they only care about numbers.
While I generally agree with your first 4 paragraphs I disagree with your last one. Engaging in a particular illegal or sinful behavior may disqualify one from being a perfect sinless Christian, but not from being a Christian.
While I generally agree with your first 4 paragraphs I disagree with your last one. Engaging in a particular illegal or sinful behavior may disqualify one from being a perfect sinless Christian, but not from being a Christian.
As a worldwide organization why would the RCC feel the need to shift it’s ‘voters’ from one jurisdiction to another?
Where do you live?
The illegal immigrant’s presence causes the legal immigrants to have to work for slave wages. We need to SECURE THE BORDER before discussing what it means for the illegals to get to the back of the line.
Southwest Arizona.
Catch him aiding and abetting, then seize all of his written communication...email, text msgs and letters.
Then, try him and ALL of his co-conspirators...even if it's Bishops and Cardinals...and send them all to prison.
If it's found the Catholic Church is SYSTEMATICALLY undermining immigration law and abetting those who break it, charge them under the RICO act and seize all church property in the US.
That is the right and just answer.
Must one be sinless to be a Christian?
How did we get on this topic? How does this correlate to my earlier post?
And I believe that they are "Moles". Go ahead and flame me.
We are talking about paperwork, not a crime. By calling an undocumented worker a criminal, you put them in the same category as a rapist or burglar.Then think of it as breaking and entering but not taking anything...Drunk driving but no one was hurt, driving without a license and insurance. Are those some of the things a Priest could accept as OK to also overlook?
We are talking about paperwork, not a crime. By calling an undocumented worker a criminal, you put them in the same category as a rapist or burglar.
"Then think of it as breaking and entering but not taking anything...Drunk driving but no one was hurt, driving without a license and insurance. Are those some of the things a Priest could accept as OK to also overlook?"
There is a man currently in a federal prison in Virginia for nothing more than not having some paperwork.
He had payroll to pay each week that came to just over $9,000. He ewas accustomed to paying his employees in cash.
The law says if you withdraw cash in amounts of $10,000 or more, you have to file some paperwork. Not $9,000, not $9,999, but $10,000.
Even though the man could show the judge that his total requirement of cash never amounted to $10,000, he was thrown in prison because the judge said that he was only withdrawing less than $10,000 to avoid the paperwork!!!
Sentance: TEN YEARS !!!
For not having the paperwork, I want all of those illegals jailed, fined, and deported.
He had payroll to pay each week that came to just over $9,000. He ewas accustomed to paying his employees in cash.My guess is THAT was his crime in the Judges mind.
Numbers of voters..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.