To: conimbricenses
Well the cops obviously werent there in the store to see it first hand. And they obviously came to the store after being called about something. It is a safe deduction from those facts that they came to the store after being told something was happening in the store by the Costco clerk who called 911. Ergo the clerk was the source of their description. And armed man damaging store property. So what in that justified the police overreaction? Or are you honestly trying to convice us that the only parties in all this more innocent than the dead guy are the men who shot him?
To: Non-Sequitur
>>Well the cops obviously werent there in the store to see it first hand. And they obviously came to the store after being called about something. It is a safe deduction from those facts that they came to the store after being told something was happening in the store by the Costco clerk who called 911. Ergo the clerk was the source of their description. >And armed man damaging store property. So what in that justified the police overreaction? Or are you honestly trying to convice us that the only parties in all this more innocent than the dead guy are the men who shot him?
Of course it's that way! Police are the authority and, as the authority, they are always in the right.
Anyone or anything that states or acts contrary to the police are evil bad-guys and should be shot!
[/sarc]
311 posted on
07/13/2010 11:25:40 AM PDT by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: Non-Sequitur
And armed man damaging store property
__________________
LMAO! You moron, he was not damaging store property.
344 posted on
07/13/2010 12:15:54 PM PDT by
mojitojoe
(When crisis becomes opportunity, crisis becomes the goal.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson