The irony here is that Brown is actually a supporter of the 2nd Amendment. At least he recognizes it as an individual right. This means Whitman doesn’t have to move very far if at all to differentiate herself, and ultimately it means no movement for the 2A in California regardless of who wins. Indeed many of the people I know who are rank the 2A high on their list of priorities are claiming they would rather vote Brown than Whitman because they don’t trust Whitman’s instincts on the 2A. She could be a gun grabbing rino fiscal conservative. Since she has no history we’ll never know, and because of Brown’s position there is no chance she will try to outflank him, and she won’t use it against him either.
Didn’t Meg Whitman ban the sale of gun barrels, magazines, triggers, firing pins and even empty shell casings on eBay?