Posted on 07/12/2010 2:56:42 PM PDT by Nachum
Greenpeace take notice, a precedent has been set.
But let's be blunt; 65 feet, 23 yards, isn't much. FELONY? I take complete issue with that, but as a hobby photographer even my little 6MB pocket camera (the one I have pretty with me much all the time) would get all the photos I'd need to antagonize this administration.
Even without its silly little 3x optical zoom.
This issue looks more like a non-interference issue, because it really doesn't restrict photographers. There may be something else involved but I don't know what it is.
Is Al-Qaida planning to attack CG ships?? They might have to deal with Anoreth and in such a battle I'd bet all on Anoreth.
Think of the photographers pursuing Princess Di, *smash*. 65 feet is across the street to the crazy cat lady’s house, and that’s pretty close to a boat working with heavy equipment. It’s certainly not going to prevent someone with a real camera, as opposed to my pocket Nikon, from taking pictures. It might prevent a collision, injuries, deaths.
Anoreth says they’ve practiced “small boat attack” drill in the Pacific. I would not discount the possibility of enviro-radicals attacking or attempting to disrupt operations in the Gulf of Mexico.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.