Obama's policies have done nothing to help the economic plight of Blacks. Screaming 'racist' is the only card left for the Democrats to play for the Black community because their promises of a better economy under Obama have been proven to be lies.
Have they DECRIED the Racist New Black Panther Movement?
The new definition of racism is “not democrat”.
Period.
The NAACP should stop listening to Janeane Garofalo....
The "White Cracker" haters (Part one and part two)
Lt. Col. Allen West: Id put the New Black Panthers on a terror watch list
Are they still boycotting South Carolina?
Did these idiots also send the same message to the black panther party scumbag who wants to kill whitey and cracker babies? I THOUGHT SO! HYPOCRITICAL RACIST PROGRESSIVE BOOT LICKERS WHO WILL DO ANYTHING TO SIT AT THE BIG TABLE including selling thier brothers and sister out!
The GOP is going to elect several black CONSERVATIVES to the House this fall...I wonder if they’ll start their own caucus..surely they won’t joing the CBC...
They should look into the facts before they decry.
It just makes them look foolish and they lose credibility.
There’s a pot and kettle joke in here somewhere...
Oh for cryin’ out loud.
And their proof of these allegations is WHAT?
The Tea Party movement has already decried any such behavior. It is so scarce as to be practically undetectable, and, truth be told, is probably from infil-traitors from their own beloved left!
The resolution isn’t worth the contents of a bedpan.
Matthew 7:3 applies :"Why do you see the speck that is in your brothers eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye?"
I say let the Black Klan (NAACP) rant all they want. Their race-baiting has run its course and people are no longer buying into this race-mongering approach to senseless political gain.
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha . . . . . . . . .
Just when you think these ignorant fools can't make themselves look any dumber, they manage to prove you wrong!!!
There isn't a single fact that associates racism with the Tea Party movement other than the DBM tossing it in as an aside and some Dem operatives conducting racist operations in an attempt to discredit the Tea Party.
With ignorance like this on display everyday in America, who needs television??
____________________________________________________
Alinsky provides a collection of rules to guide the process. But he emphasizes these rules must be translated into real-life tactics that are fluid and responsive to the situation at hand.
* Rule 1: Power is not only what you have, but what an opponent thinks you have. If your organization is small, hide your numbers in the dark and raise a din that will make everyone think you have many more people than you do.
* Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people. The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.
* Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.
* Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.
* Rule 5: Ridicule is mans most potent weapon. Its hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.
* Rule 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy. If your people arent having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.
* Rule 7: A tactic that drags on for too long becomes a drag. Commitment may become ritualistic as people turn to other issues.
* Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage.
* Rule 9: The threat is more terrifying than the thing itself. When Alinsky leaked word that large numbers of poor people were going to tie up the washrooms of OHare Airport, Chicago city authorities quickly agreed to act on a longstanding commitment to a ghetto organization. They imagined the mayhem as thousands of passengers poured off airplanes to discover every washroom occupied. Then they imagined the international embarrassment and the damage to the citys reputation.
* Rule 10: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Avoid being trapped by an opponent or an interviewer who says, Okay, what would you do?
* Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Dont try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.
According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting. The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.[2]
Alinsky codified and wrote a clear set of rules[3] for community organizing. His rules for radicals are now used as key tactics to learn in the training of new community organizers.
In a separate chapter he suggests that the perennial question, "Does the end justify the means?" is meaningless as it stands: the real and only question regarding the ethics of means and ends is, and always has been, "Does this particular end justify this particular means?"
Alinsky continues by stating several rules of the ethics of means and ends:
* The judgment of the ethics of means is dependent upon the political position of those sitting in judgment. * In war, the end justifies almost any means. * Judgment must be made in the context of the times in which the action occurred and not from any other chronological vantage point. * Concern with ethics increases with the number of means available and vice versa. * The less important the end to be desired, the more one can afford to engage in ethical evaluations of means. * Generally, success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics. * The morality of a means depends upon whether the means is being employed at a time of imminent defeat or imminent victory. * Any effective means is automatically judged by the opposition as being unethical. * You do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments. * Goals must be phrased in general terms like "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," "Of the Common Welfare," "Pursuit of Happiness," or "Bread and Peace."
These rules of the ethics of means and ends are only one chapter of his book, totally distinct from his "clear set of rules for community organizing."
Beck is right — the Progressives NEED a race riot/provocation to justify persecution of the Tea Parties. NAALCP is jumping on the bandwagon trying to guarantee it as well. How much better are they than the New Black Panther Klan?
Our first mistake was not picking our own cotton.
Godwin’s law needs to be expanded to include charges of racism.
Is this for real? I swear it reads like satire.
I guess it really is too much to ask that people have facts to support their positions.