To: sonofstrangelove
I have flown in a few different Antonov offerings and I am not impressed.
2 posted on
07/10/2010 12:06:45 AM PDT by
999replies
(Thune/Rubio 2012)
To: sonofstrangelove
I wonder has Boeing studied the idea of using the Boeing 787-8 as the basis of a new tanker.
But the primary reason why Boeing chose the KC-767 based on the 767-200(ER) is the parking space used by the KC-767 is not much more than the parking space used by the KC-135, which means Air Force bases don't need to rebuild their ramp areas to accommodate a plane with a larger wing span. Since the production tooling for the 767 is already fully paid for, Boeing can use the 767 production jigs to produce as many as 300-350 KC-767's to completely replace the KC-135 fleet over the next 15 years.
7 posted on
07/10/2010 3:01:19 AM PDT by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's economic cure)
To: sonofstrangelove
Why not a C-17 knock off ?
8 posted on
07/10/2010 4:21:10 AM PDT by
Vinnie
(You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
To: sonofstrangelove
I’ve said this before that one day we will be purchasing our fighter jets and cargo airplanes from Russia. Looks like we are well on our way there. Now who won the Cold War?
10 posted on
07/10/2010 5:23:03 AM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: sonofstrangelove
WHAT IS ANTONOV EVEN DOING IN THIS BIDDING PROCESS???
11 posted on
07/10/2010 5:32:29 AM PDT by
RaceBannon
(RON PAUL: THE PARTY OF TRUTHERS, TRAITORS AND UFO CHASERS!!!)
To: sonofstrangelove
Ants... ya gotta be kiddin me.
12 posted on
07/10/2010 6:20:28 AM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson