Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I don't think articles from this magazine show up here very often, so I thought I'd post this one since we watch foreign election results (especially in Europe) with interest. A lot of FP position pieces regarding the Chinese military seem to offer some interesting facts although they can sometimes exihibit the sort of bad judgement and wooly thinking that better people might get marched to the wall for. Anyway...
1 posted on 07/09/2010 10:38:40 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dr_who

If nothing else, the political slant of this periodical might be evident by the position of the “origin” of the above chart relative to Obama. Obama’s not an economic centrist and the Democrat party is not right-of-center on much of anything. Makes me wonder if the current ( and Bush-era) state department bureaucracy thinks otherwise.


2 posted on 07/09/2010 10:43:20 PM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dr_who

That graph there is...definitely open to question. Actually I’m familiar with the British conservatives and the cdu and I can’t see the logic behind their relative placement.


3 posted on 07/09/2010 10:45:45 PM PDT by skintight buffoonery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dr_who

This chart is CRAP.

There are only two world views. And not much of a sliding scale on them. Politics and Religion are not grays they are binary. One and zero. On and Off.

Christian world view and ALL that comes from it. Or God hating and all that comes from that. You ARE one or the other. And if you think you are NOT, or think this is wrong or an over simplification, you are God hating.

Now, if we are all God fearing, Christians, we will STILL have issues over which we disagree, but, in the same wisdom of our founders will prayerfully work them out knowing our end goals are the same.

Anything less than this, is utterly absent of this.


5 posted on 07/09/2010 11:10:53 PM PDT by RachelFaith (2010 is going to be a 100 seat Tsunami - Unless the GOP Senate ruins it all...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dr_who

Besides having issues with the placement, things are much easier for me to understand with the up-down axis being authoritarianism/free choice (classical liberal or libertarian) and the left/right being social.

There really isn’t much difference between being authoritarian in economic vs. social aspects, because if someone is like that for one, they usually tend to be that way toward the other. Healthcare is a pretty good example of this.

On another point, however, it’s pretty difficult to find a classical liberal in Europe. Perhaps this graph is depicting the various shades of authoritarianism and if so it makes far more sense.


7 posted on 07/09/2010 11:20:11 PM PDT by dajeeps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dr_who

bump, but the argument in this article feels as old as the hills. Of course left and right are not absolute eternal definitions; they are relative to one’s perspective. I remember the people feverishly working on new charts, diagrams, after 1989

So if in Germany, 27 February 1933, the NSDAP was “right” and the KPD was “left” (where Rosa Luxemburg had defected), does that furnish any guidance whatsoever today? Everything depends on circumstances, otherwise there’d be no need to think


18 posted on 07/10/2010 12:03:27 AM PDT by ash-housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson