Replies

But lets get one thing straight.....you arent going to be able to round up 12 to 20 million people without some serious violations of EVERYONES civil liberties..

You need to get something straight. All illegals aliens are criminals just by being in this country hence the term illegal alien! Federal immigration law requires they be deported!

We’re talking check points...cordained off neighborhoods ...house to house searches...and your going to need the military to do it...so kiss Posse Comitatus goodbye..

No, we’re talking arresting illegals under the same circumstances as the Arizona law will require. Run background checks on anyone who is suspected of committing a crime other than being in the country illegally, particularly if they fail to produce a valid ID.

The ones you cant find with sweeps and house to house searches will requite informants and roving wiretaps...perhaps even a “secret police” force.

As I stated earlier, the ones that aren’t captured will see the handwriting on the wall, become tired of being on the run and constantly living in fear of being captured. They will leave the country voluntarily. They left Oklahoma after that state passed its immigration law and the same is happening in Arizona. Illegals will leave the country voluntarily if federal immigration laws are enforced.

Be careful what you wish for...you just might get it...

I hope so because I want federal immigration laws strictly enforced!

You dont round up 12 to 20 million people like that...that’s a fantasy...self deport....BUWHAHAHAHAHA!...yeah right..

No illegals left in Oklahoma?....farce...

Everyone will flee in terror?.....joke...

What you are proposing is “amnesty light”....oh you can stay if you dont break the law...or are sneaky enough not to get caught....PFFFT!

You want to get rid of them...then take the gloves off...and get rid of them...ALL of them...

Anything less IS Amnesty.

Or maybe we should lock down the border first....and then pick them off through enforcement like Palin said...

Palin didnt propose the 60 day thing...BOR did...

I could live with an ollie ollie ox in free...then a hard line after that....

or I could live with taking the gloves off...I look good in jackboots and I like kicking in doors...

but that’s about the only two choices you got...

What you’ve proposed is the same thing as Palin has said...

She supports 1070 you know...and locking down the border...

You dont round up 12 to 20 million people like that...that’s a fantasy...self deport....BUWHAHAHAHAHA!...yeah right..

Tell that to Oklahoma, Arizona and Rhode Island all of whom have strict immigration laws and illegals are avoiding those states like the plague.

No illegals left in Oklahoma?....farce...

Misquoting me doesn't strengthen your position. I stated many left left the state shortly after Oklahoma enacted its law in 2008. Whatever number there are left is far smaller than before they passed their law and makes it much easier to single out any who remain.

You want to get rid of them...then take the gloves off...and get rid of them...ALL of them...

That's what I've been stating all along by strictly enforcing the existing immigration laws!

Palin didnt propose the 60 day thing...BOR did...

She agreed to register illegals. PALIN: Do we make them register with the federal government? Yes, we do. This will allow them to remain in the country.

I could live with an ollie ollie ox in free...then a hard line after that...

That violates current federal immigration laws and would be far more difficult to enforce as illegals will run and hide after registering, if they bother registering, or register with false identification.

What you’ve proposed is the same thing as Palin has said...

My position is not merely a proposal! It is the law! Her proposal to register illegals is not even close to the strictly enforcing the current immigration laws.

She supports 1070 you know...and locking down the border...

SB1070 does not allow for registering illegals as Palin endorses. Palin and other politicians focus on more security on the border and building a strong barrier while deliberately addressing amnesty as a separate issue. That couldn't be more disingenuous. There's no reason both can't be done concurrently.