They should stop right here, because anything they say beyond this is just going downhill. But, they didn't. They called for 'genuine dialogue'. Ah, how does 'dialogue' genuine or fake, secure the borders?
RE: They called for ‘genuine dialogue’. Ah, how does ‘dialogue’ genuine or fake, secure the borders?
Well for one — a dialogue should be serious about creating a GOOD PLAN to secure the borders.
If they’re serious about it, I am not going to put sinister motives into their minds regarding whether their intent is genuine or fake.