[dragnet2]

I see you're still trying to convince everyone that the cop intentionally murdered this guy in front of his fellow officers and a dozen witnesses in broad daylight.

A brilliant straw-man, that.

No, it's not brilliant. It's just the facts maam, and a clear, a simple way of bringing home the fact that the cop obviously did not intentionally murder this guy.

In fact, you know this too!

[Filo]

No, it's not brilliant. It's just the facts maam, and a clear, a simple way of bringing home the fact that the cop obviously did not intentionally murder this guy.

In fact, you know this too!

Indeed I do, which is why I haven't said he is guilty of Murder 1 beyond the whole weapon swapping bit.

Regardless, murder 2 doesn't need intent to kill and he's clearly guilty of it.

But you keep lying about what I say if it makes you feel better.

If you can't be right, right then at least you can be right against something made up, eh?