Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wideawake
He testified, and the jury obviously believed he did not intentionally shoot a prone, unarmed man in front of hundreds of people.

It was a reasonable verdict and Obama knows it....just like Obama knows he has to keep black Americans stirred up and believing they are oppressed. Otherwise where would the commies get their votes?

39 posted on 07/09/2010 8:32:04 AM PDT by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: roses of sharon
the jury obviously believed he did not intentionally shoot a prone, unarmed man in front of hundreds of people

The jury did not believe that he shot to kill - and I don't believe he shot to kill either.

But in a situation where you think you might be rushed by an angry crowd of drunks you are definitely not thinking: "How would it look tomorrow if I shot this punk" - but you well may be thinking: "If I wing this punk right now, this crowd that could rush me will think twice."

And I'm a little tired of the "doting father Oscar Grant" angle - it's about as believable as the "loving fiance Sean Bell" narrative in NYC.

The valorizing of violent, drunken thugs wandering the streets in the wee hours doing dirt is extremely tiresome.

44 posted on 07/09/2010 9:04:45 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson