Given the judge’s name, it is fitting that his decision is 100% Bull.
JOSEPH L. TAURO has served as a Judge of the United States District Court since 1972. He was elevated to the position of Chief Judge in January 1992 and served in that capacity until January 1999. His public service prior to being appointed to the bench included that as United States Attorney for Massachusetts, Chief Legal Counsel to the Governor of Massachusetts, and two years in the Army as a Nike Guided Missile Officer.
A graduate of Brown University and of the Cornell Law School, Judge Tauro practiced law for a number of years with his own firm, and is admitted to the Bar Associations of Massachusetts and the District of Columbia. He was a Visiting Professor of Law at the Boston University School of Law, and is a trustee of Brown University. For many years, Judge Tauro served as a trustee of The Children’s Hospital Medical Center in Boston, as well as of the Massachusetts General Hospital. He has been a member of the Judicial Conference of the United States, and has served on the Judicial Conference Committees on Codes of Conduct, as well as The Jury System.
Judge Tauro has received honorary degrees from Brown University, Boston University, Northeastern University, Suffolk University, The University of Massachusetts, and the New England School of Law. He has also received the Cornell Law School Distinguished Alumnus Award, the Brown University Brown Bear Award, the Massachusetts Bar Association Hennessey Leadership Award, and the Boston Bar Association Citation of Judicial Excellence.
Judge Tauro’s family includes his wife, three children and six grandchildren.
It may well be the case that Judge Joseph Tauro can’t quite define it but Fur Shur everybody in the country now knows what he likes eh!
Calif citizens passed a “marriage is straight” proposition law and so now a homosexual judge is tasked to decide if it is Constitutional or if he personally likes it, either of those two criteria being how Supreme Court and down judges make their rulings. The latter particularly.
For sure we need Der Furher’s new woman as the 2nd of the Supreme Court judges. After all, the stodgy old Supreme Court needs new, fresh thinking and seeing as she has little or no idea of the difference between the Constitution and “taking a constitutional”, plus her belief that the Courts should do whatever the Exec/Legis want, and that rule by “Cuz I sez so.” is valid.
Plus “international law” should trump the U.S. Constitution (i.e. whatever law is in Cuba, China, Russia, Sudan, North Korea, the Gaza Strip, etc).