The is one thing about a fact ,it never changes. obama was previously listed as being born at Queens hosiptal. So where was he born at Queens,Kapiolani, coastal hospital(Kenya). Until such time as a,CERTIFIED BIRTH CERTIFICARE is released we will never know.
But as most liberals do ,you are missing the point, it doesn’t matter where obama was born at ,he is not a Natural born citizen.
Why are you allowing yourself to be used? Are you interested in the facts? Is there any logical reason why obama has sealed all his record? should obama be above the law?
The is one thing about a fact ,it never changes. obama was previously listed as being born at Queens hosiptal. So where was he born at Queens,Kapiolani, coastal hospital(Kenya). Until such time as a,CERTIFIED BIRTH CERTIFICARE is released we will never know.
But as most liberals do ,you are missing the point, it doesn’t matter where obama was born at ,he is not a Natural born citizen.
Why are you allowing yourself to be used? Are you interested in the facts? Is there any logical reason why obama has sealed all his record? should obama be above the law?
You are an unwitting dupe for Obama but you’re much too stupid to realize it. If Obama didn’t have the birthers, he’d have to invent them.
Its a classic Saul Alinsky, community organizer training “divide and conquer” technique. Alinsky’s actual words: “take what your opponent perceives as your greatest weakness and use it against them.”
I’m sure the lawyer/constitutional law senior lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School part of Obama enjoys being 70 and 0 in lawsuits challenging his eligibility.
Here’s what a conservative Republican federal judge from Georgia appointed by George W. Bush on the recommendation of Georgia Senator Saxby Chambliss had to say. The Judge is a former Republican state legislator:
“A spurious claim questioning the President’s constitutional legitimacy may be protected by the First Amendment, but a Court’s placement of its imprimatur upon a claim that is so lacking in factual support that it is frivolous would undoubtedly disserve the public interest.
For all of these reasons, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s
motion for a temporary restraining order should be denied.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons previously stated, Plaintiff’s motion for a
temporary restraining order is denied and Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed in its entirety. Defendants shall recover their costs from Plaintiff. “–US Federal District Court Judge for the Middle District of Georgia Clay Land in dismissing “Rhodes v MacDonald,” September 16, 2009.
The Judge then went on to sanction “birther” attorney Orly Taitz with a fine of $20,000 for misusing the legal system by filing frivolous lawsuits that are only being filed to advance a political agenda.