Your continues deflecting postings is NOT a question on if you agree or not with the NBC people here (the Constitution) but a concerted effort to screw up the discussion. I wish you good luck to see your misguided results after Nov. 4 election 2012!!!
Now jamese, it seems you have received orders to deflect the real issue of an illegal alien or the attempt from others to discourage the removal of an usurper who is determined to take the country down the Marxism lanes with your approval, or do you have ADD???
Your continues deflecting postings is NOT a question on if you agree or not with the NBC people here (the Constitution) but a concerted effort to screw up the discussion. I wish you good luck to see your misguided results after Nov. 4 election 2012!!!
If a Grand Jury investigation with subpoena power could accomplish both or either of those goals, why won’t you support that legal strategy? Both the Nixon resignation and the Clinton impeachment were derived from Grand Jury investigations, not from civil lawsuits.
What you call “screwing up the discussion” is in actuality presenting real facts that you are unable to refute.
I ask once again, why is a Republican administration in Hawaii supporting Obama on the natural born citizen issue?
What would be their motive?
Why has no official of the national Republican Party including John McCain and Sarah Palin joined any lawsuit challenging Obama’s eligibility? Both McCain and Palin might well be granted legal standing to sue Obama.
Why has the Republican National Committee not filed an amicus brief in support of any Obama eligibility lawsuit?
Why did a Republican Governor and a Republican Attorney General in Indiana defend Obama in the Ankeny et. al v The Governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels lawsuit which ruled that Obama is indeed a natural born citizen.
“Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by [the Supreme Court of the United States in their 1898 decision in the case of U.S. v.] Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States natural-born citizens.”—Indiana Court of Appeals, “Ankeny et. al. v The Governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels,” Nov. 12, 2009