In the Wong Kim Ark , the wording AND SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION WAS USED which refers to the allegiance of the parents(Senator Brown 1868). Children receive their citizenship from their parents. If a child is born to U.S. citizens, they have full and complete citizenship (natural born) if they are born to parents in the naturalization process they are also naturalized with their parents. The Indiana case is a joke ,it has no bearing on federal law and it quoted the Ark case ,but chose to ignor the fact ark was declared a native born citizen not a natural born citizen. obama appears to have mixed loyalties , the very thing that Article two was meant to block. obama is not going to allow any grand jury to get a copy of his birth records, it is the proof that would remove him from the White House.
In the Wong Kim Ark , the wording AND SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION WAS USED which refers to the allegiance of the parents(Senator Brown 1868). Children receive their citizenship from their parents. If a child is born to U.S. citizens, they have full and complete citizenship (natural born) if they are born to parents in the naturalization process they are also naturalized with their parents. The Indiana case is a joke ,it has no bearing on federal law and it quoted the Ark case ,but chose to ignor the fact ark was declared a native born citizen not a natural born citizen. obama appears to have mixed loyalties , the very thing that Article two was meant to block. obama is not going to allow any grand jury to get a copy of his birth records, it is the proof that would remove him from the White House.
“Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by [the Supreme Court of the United States in their 1898 decision in the case of U.S. v.] Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States natural-born citizens.”—Indiana Court of Appeals, “Ankeny et. al. v The Governor of Indiana, Mitch Daniels,” Nov. 12, 2009