Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: omegadawn
He has committed several impeachable offenses. BTW, your method would only work if the court didn't dismiss the case. If I recall correctly this has been tried at least once and it didn't get to first base let alone result in the removal of Bozo the WH clown.

Not enforcing the immigration laws is an impeachable offense, it is illegal for him to not up hold them, taking over private companies and the student loans are also illegal and impeachable, dismissing a case on racial grounds is also impeachable.

The problem is we have a legislature that won't impeach him no matter what he does, not from lack of offenses from which to choose.

32 posted on 07/08/2010 3:59:22 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: calex59

I don’t disagree with you on much of what you say , but My primary point is that I think it would be easier to prove obama is in violation of Article 2 then it would be to prove any impeachable offence. A person is either a natural born citizen or he is not . THE problem is that the A.G.(holder) is the one that has to issue the Quo Waranto(demand to show proof). All cases against obama have ben dismissed on standing.( they didn’t have a right to question obama’s egibility ). obama court cases has cost almost 2 million dollars so far just to make sure no one gets a Certified Copy of his birth certificate. He know that this is his weak link, anyone who gets a copy of his birth record has proof that he is not a Natural Born citizen. Of course all the proof in the world means nothing if congress will not enforce the law.


33 posted on 07/08/2010 7:17:09 AM PDT by omegadawn (qualified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson